QQFSF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Updated
Dec 31 closing price
Capitalization
127.18M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
TYCMY
Price
$27.97
Change
+$0.54 (+1.97%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Capitalization
7.9B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QQFSF vs TYCMY

Header iconQQFSF vs TYCMY Comparison
Open Charts QQFSF vs TYCMYBanner chart's image
Qinqin Foodstuffs Group Cayman
Price$0.06
Change-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Volume$2.1K
Capitalization127.18M
Tingyi Cayman Islands Holdings
Price$27.97
Change+$0.54 (+1.97%)
Volume$4.53K
Capitalization7.9B
QQFSF vs TYCMY Comparison Chart in %
TYCMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QQFSF vs. TYCMY commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QQFSF is a Hold and TYCMY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (QQFSF: $0.06 vs. TYCMY: $27.97)
Brand notoriety: QQFSF and TYCMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QQFSF: 100% vs. TYCMY: 149%
Market capitalization -- QQFSF: $127.18M vs. TYCMY: $7.9B
QQFSF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $127.18M. TYCMY’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $7.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $267.04B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QQFSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTYCMY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • QQFSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TYCMY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TYCMY is a better buy in the long-term than QQFSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TYCMY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • TYCMY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

QQFSF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TYCMY (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +4.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +252.85%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+0.99% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TYCMY($7.9B) has a higher market cap than QQFSF($127M). QQFSF has higher P/E ratio than TYCMY: QQFSF (16.66) vs TYCMY (13.66). TYCMY YTD gains are higher at: 14.164 vs. QQFSF (0.000). TYCMY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.06B vs. QQFSF (22.2M). TYCMY has more cash in the bank: 13.1B vs. QQFSF (410M). QQFSF has less debt than TYCMY: QQFSF (150M) vs TYCMY (15.2B). TYCMY has higher revenues than QQFSF: TYCMY (79.5B) vs QQFSF (963M).
QQFSFTYCMYQQFSF / TYCMY
Capitalization127M7.9B2%
EBITDA22.2M7.06B0%
Gain YTD0.00014.164-
P/E Ratio16.6613.66122%
Revenue963M79.5B1%
Total Cash410M13.1B3%
Total Debt150M15.2B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QQFSF: Fundamental Ratings
QQFSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
31
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
73
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QQFSFTYCMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
3%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
2%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TYCMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JETD7.240.22
+3.17%
MAX Airlines -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
SEMG26.41-0.21
-0.78%
Suncoast Select Growth ETF
DSL11.79-0.13
-1.09%
DOUBLELINE Income SOLUTIONS FUND
SPVM63.82-1.30
-1.99%
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF
DFNL43.34-1.13
-2.53%
Davis Select Financial ETF

QQFSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QQFSF has been loosely correlated with ZHYBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QQFSF jumps, then ZHYBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QQFSF
1D Price
Change %
QQFSF100%
N/A
ZHYBF - QQFSF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NSLYF - QQFSF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TYCMY - QQFSF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.97%
CHFLF - QQFSF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JWLLF - QQFSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TYCMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TYCMY has been loosely correlated with CIADY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TYCMY jumps, then CIADY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TYCMY
1D Price
Change %
TYCMY100%
+1.97%
CIADY - TYCMY
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
WHGLY - TYCMY
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.07%
HAIN - TYCMY
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.62%
RKDA - TYCMY
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.77%
ARRT - TYCMY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More