QS
Price
$5.45
Change
+$0.20 (+3.81%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:13 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.04B
28 days until earnings call
WPRT
Price
$3.73
Change
+$0.03 (+0.81%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:19 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
113.57M
Ad is loading...

QS vs WPRT

Header iconQS vs WPRT Comparison
Open Charts QS vs WPRTBanner chart's image
QuantumScape
Price$5.45
Change+$0.20 (+3.81%)
Volume$2.53K
Capitalization3.04B
Westport Fuel Systems
Price$3.73
Change+$0.03 (+0.81%)
Volume$100
Capitalization113.57M
QS vs WPRT Comparison Chart
Loading...
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WPRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QS vs. WPRT commentary
Jan 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QS is a StrongBuy and WPRT is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2025
Stock price -- (QS: $5.25 vs. WPRT: $3.70)
Brand notoriety: QS and WPRT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QS: 104% vs. WPRT: 34%
Market capitalization -- QS: $3.04B vs. WPRT: $113.57M
QS [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $3.04B. WPRT’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $113.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWPRT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • QS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WPRT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, QS is a better buy in the long-term than WPRT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WPRT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WPRT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QS is a better buy in the short-term than WPRT.

Price Growth

QS (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -16.53% price change this week, while WPRT (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -9.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

QS is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

WPRT is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-0.26% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QS($3.04B) has a higher market cap than WPRT($114M). WPRT YTD gains are higher at: 3.352 vs. QS (1.156). WPRT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -33.25M vs. QS (-392.95M). QS has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. WPRT (54.8M). WPRT has less debt than QS: WPRT (82.8M) vs QS (101M). WPRT has higher revenues than QS: WPRT (332M) vs QS (0).
QSWPRTQS / WPRT
Capitalization3.04B114M2,666%
EBITDA-392.95M-33.25M1,182%
Gain YTD1.1563.35234%
P/E RatioN/A8.57-
Revenue0332M-
Total Cash1.07B54.8M1,954%
Total Debt101M82.8M122%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WPRT: Fundamental Ratings
WPRT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
88
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QSWPRT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WPRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AICOF0.160.03
+22.20%
Generative AI Solutions Corp.
TNEYF3.410.05
+1.36%
Tamarack Valley Energy, Ltd.
CSLLY86.870.48
+0.56%
CSL Ltd.
CGEMY32.00-0.12
-0.37%
Capgemini SE
CZMWY46.25-1.58
-3.30%
Carl Zeiss Meditec AG

QS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QS has been loosely correlated with AEVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QS jumps, then AEVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QS
1D Price
Change %
QS100%
-2.60%
AEVA - QS
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
AXL - QS
38%
Loosely correlated
+7.72%
VC - QS
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
GGR - QS
36%
Loosely correlated
+3.46%
LIDR - QS
36%
Loosely correlated
-4.62%
More

WPRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WPRT has been loosely correlated with TEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WPRT jumps, then TEN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WPRT
1D Price
Change %
WPRT100%
+0.82%
TEN - WPRT
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
THRM - WPRT
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.61%
FRSX - WPRT
25%
Poorly correlated
+4.00%
LIDR - WPRT
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.62%
QS - WPRT
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.60%
More