GGR
Price
$3.96
Change
-$0.04 (-1.00%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:05 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
80.29M
44 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QS
Price
$7.42
Change
-$0.20 (-2.63%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.68B
36 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GGR vs QS

GGR vs QS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GGR vs. QS commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGR is a Hold and QS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (GGR: $4.00 vs. QS: $7.61)
Brand notoriety: GGR and QS are both not notable
GGR represents the Motor Vehicles, while QS is part of the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GGR: 354% vs. QS: 117%
Market capitalization -- GGR: $80.29M vs. QS: $4.68B
GGR [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $80.29M. QS’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $4.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $1.52T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $70.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $65.84B. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.4B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GGR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GGR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, QS is a better buy in the long-term than GGR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GGR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GGR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GGR is a better buy in the short-term than QS.

Price Growth

GGR (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +1.01% price change this week, while QS (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +5.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -3.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was -17.52%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -2.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

GGR is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

QS is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (-3.41% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

@Auto Parts: OEM (-2.34% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QS($4.68B) has a higher market cap than GGR($80.3M). GGR YTD gains are higher at: 45.985 vs. QS (-26.967). GGR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 35M vs. QS (-347.9M). QS has more cash in the bank: 905M vs. GGR (77.3M). QS has less debt than GGR: QS (69.2M) vs GGR (380M). GGR has higher revenues than QS: GGR (281M) vs QS (0).
GGRQSGGR / QS
Capitalization80.3M4.68B2%
EBITDA35M-347.9M-10%
Gain YTD45.985-26.967-171%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue281M0-
Total Cash77.3M905M9%
Total Debt380M69.2M549%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QS: Fundamental Ratings
QS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
82
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GGRQS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GGR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LAFQX22.36N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Affiliated R2
AVUYX8.85N/A
N/A
American Century Value Y
BRZAX13.94N/A
N/A
BlackRock Sust Aware Adg Intl Eq Inv A
PSTAX21.10N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Capital Growth A
AMDWX19.31-0.18
-0.92%
Amana Developing World Investor

GGR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGR has been closely correlated with DCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GGR jumps, then DCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGR
1D Price
Change %
GGR100%
N/A
DCX - GGR
88%
Closely correlated
N/A
QS - GGR
44%
Loosely correlated
-5.35%
APTV - GGR
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
DAN - GGR
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.23%
MGA - GGR
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
More