GGR
Price
$0.62
Change
-$0.02 (-3.12%)
Updated
Dec 13, 11:32 AM (EDT)
QS
Price
$4.92
Change
-$0.06 (-1.20%)
Updated
Dec 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
61 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GGR vs QS

Header iconGGR vs QS Comparison
Open Charts GGR vs QSBanner chart's image
Gogoro
Price$0.62
Change-$0.02 (-3.12%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
QuantumScape
Price$4.92
Change-$0.06 (-1.20%)
Volume$81.43K
CapitalizationN/A
GGR vs QS Comparison Chart
Loading...
GGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GGR vs. QS commentary
Dec 13, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGR is a Buy and QS is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 13, 2024
Stock price -- (GGR: $0.64 vs. QS: $4.93)
Brand notoriety: GGR and QS are both not notable
GGR represents the Motor Vehicles, while QS is part of the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GGR: 57% vs. QS: 58%
Market capitalization -- GGR: $449.69M vs. QS: $3.04B
GGR [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $449.69M. QS’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $559.85B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $33.51B. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GGR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GGR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GGR and QS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GGR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GGR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GGR and QS are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GGR (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +5.86% price change this week, while QS (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -1.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.49%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

GGR is expected to report earnings on Nov 14, 2024.

QS is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (+1.74% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.94% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QS($3.04B) has a higher market cap than GGR($450M). QS YTD gains are higher at: -29.065 vs. GGR (-75.287). GGR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 44.7M vs. QS (-392.95M). QS has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. GGR (152M). QS has less debt than GGR: QS (101M) vs GGR (393M). GGR has higher revenues than QS: GGR (354M) vs QS (0).
GGRQSGGR / QS
Capitalization450M3.04B15%
EBITDA44.7M-392.95M-11%
Gain YTD-75.287-29.065259%
P/E Ratio128.21N/A-
Revenue354M0-
Total Cash152M1.07B14%
Total Debt393M101M389%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GGRQS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AFGIX33.04N/A
N/A
Alger Global Equity I
MITBX39.58-0.15
-0.38%
MFS Massachusetts Investors Tr B
TVAFX84.65-0.35
-0.41%
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Core A
MECDX15.29-0.09
-0.59%
NYLI Epoch Capital Growth Class A
FIJYX32.58-1.21
-3.58%
Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Z

GGR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGR has been loosely correlated with QS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GGR jumps, then QS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGR
1D Price
Change %
GGR100%
+3.79%
QS - GGR
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
APTV - GGR
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
DAN - GGR
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.69%
MGA - GGR
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
HYLN - GGR
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
More

QS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QS has been loosely correlated with AEVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QS jumps, then AEVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QS
1D Price
Change %
QS100%
-1.20%
AEVA - QS
52%
Loosely correlated
-3.78%
AXL - QS
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.74%
GGR - QS
36%
Loosely correlated
+3.79%
LIDR - QS
36%
Loosely correlated
-10.85%
CPS - QS
34%
Loosely correlated
-3.52%
More