QSEP
Price
$0.21
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
23.82M
SBOEF
Price
$33.47
Change
-$3.53 (-9.54%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
970.02M
Interact to see
Advertisement

QSEP vs SBOEF

Header iconQSEP vs SBOEF Comparison
Open Charts QSEP vs SBOEFBanner chart's image
QS Energy
Price$0.21
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$82.7K
Capitalization23.82M
Schoeller Bleckmann Oilfield Equipment AG
Price$33.47
Change-$3.53 (-9.54%)
Volume$800
Capitalization970.02M
QSEP vs SBOEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
QSEP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBOEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QSEP vs. SBOEF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QSEP is a Hold and SBOEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (QSEP: $0.21 vs. SBOEF: $33.47)
Brand notoriety: QSEP and SBOEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QSEP: 17% vs. SBOEF: 100%
Market capitalization -- QSEP: $23.82M vs. SBOEF: $970.02M
QSEP [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $23.82M. SBOEF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $970.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QSEP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSBOEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • QSEP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SBOEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both QSEP and SBOEF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QSEP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBOEF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QSEP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SBOEF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QSEP is a better buy in the short-term than SBOEF.

Price Growth

QSEP (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +10.42% price change this week, while SBOEF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +1.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

QSEP is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+1.62% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBOEF($970M) has a higher market cap than QSEP($23.8M). QSEP YTD gains are higher at: 39.867 vs. SBOEF (-32.520). SBOEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 144M vs. QSEP (-1.2M). SBOEF has more cash in the bank: 302M vs. QSEP (107K). QSEP has less debt than SBOEF: QSEP (1.91M) vs SBOEF (271M). SBOEF has higher revenues than QSEP: SBOEF (548M) vs QSEP (0).
QSEPSBOEFQSEP / SBOEF
Capitalization23.8M970M2%
EBITDA-1.2M144M-1%
Gain YTD39.867-32.520-123%
P/E RatioN/A9.69-
Revenue0548M-
Total Cash107K302M0%
Total Debt1.91M271M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QSEP vs SBOEF: Fundamental Ratings
QSEP
SBOEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6446
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5384
SMR RATING
1..100
10072
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3882
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10066
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBOEF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for QSEP (97). This means that SBOEF’s stock grew significantly faster than QSEP’s over the last 12 months.

QSEP's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as SBOEF (84). This means that QSEP’s stock grew similarly to SBOEF’s over the last 12 months.

SBOEF's SMR Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as QSEP (100). This means that SBOEF’s stock grew similarly to QSEP’s over the last 12 months.

QSEP's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBOEF (82). This means that QSEP’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBOEF’s over the last 12 months.

SBOEF's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QSEP (100). This means that SBOEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QSEP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QSEPSBOEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QSEP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBOEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CYDY0.280.01
+5.56%
CytoDyn Inc.
NDGPF0.39N/A
N/A
Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.
GRDAF0.02N/A
-0.87%
Grounded Lithium Corp
KKPNF4.79-0.06
-1.24%
Royal KPN NV
FSXLF0.29-0.01
-4.32%
GREAT PACIFIC GOLD CORP.

QSEP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QSEP and PLSDF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QSEP and PLSDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QSEP
1D Price
Change %
QSEP100%
+0.05%
PLSDF - QSEP
11%
Poorly correlated
+6.59%
TAGP - QSEP
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KEGX - QSEP
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PDER - QSEP
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSFDF - QSEP
6%
Poorly correlated
-6.88%
More

SBOEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBOEF and SAPMY have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBOEF and SAPMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBOEF
1D Price
Change %
SBOEF100%
N/A
SAPMY - SBOEF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSYTF - SBOEF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
QSEP - SBOEF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
TAGP - SBOEF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNVVF - SBOEF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More