QSEP
Price
$0.24
Change
-$0.02 (-7.69%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
23.82M
TAGP
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
104.71M
Interact to see
Advertisement

QSEP vs TAGP

Header iconQSEP vs TAGP Comparison
Open Charts QSEP vs TAGPBanner chart's image
QS Energy
Price$0.24
Change-$0.02 (-7.69%)
Volume$70.52K
Capitalization23.82M
Tristar Acquisition Group
Price$0.03
Change-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Volume$3.5K
Capitalization104.71M
QSEP vs TAGP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
QSEP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TAGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QSEP vs. TAGP commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QSEP is a Hold and TAGP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (QSEP: $0.24 vs. TAGP: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: QSEP and TAGP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QSEP: 23% vs. TAGP: 10%
Market capitalization -- QSEP: $23.82M vs. TAGP: $104.71M
QSEP [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $23.82M. TAGP’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $104.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QSEP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTAGP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • QSEP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TAGP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, QSEP is a better buy in the long-term than TAGP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QSEP’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAGP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QSEP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TAGP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TAGP is a better buy in the short-term than QSEP.

Price Growth

QSEP (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -7.47% price change this week, while TAGP (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -14.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -2.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-2.01% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TAGP($105M) has a higher market cap than QSEP($23.8M). QSEP YTD gains are higher at: 63.200 vs. TAGP (45.909). TAGP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -58.87K vs. QSEP (-1.2M). TAGP has more cash in the bank: 7.39M vs. QSEP (107K). QSEP has less debt than TAGP: QSEP (1.91M) vs TAGP (40.3M). QSEP (0) and TAGP (0) have equivalent revenues.
QSEPTAGPQSEP / TAGP
Capitalization23.8M105M23%
EBITDA-1.2M-58.87K2,038%
Gain YTD63.20045.909138%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash107K7.39M1%
Total Debt1.91M40.3M5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QSEP vs TAGP: Fundamental Ratings
QSEP
TAGP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
498
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4697
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3561
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3738

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TAGP's Valuation (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for QSEP (98). This means that TAGP’s stock grew significantly faster than QSEP’s over the last 12 months.

QSEP's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TAGP (97). This means that QSEP’s stock grew somewhat faster than TAGP’s over the last 12 months.

QSEP's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TAGP (100). This means that QSEP’s stock grew similarly to TAGP’s over the last 12 months.

QSEP's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as TAGP (61). This means that QSEP’s stock grew similarly to TAGP’s over the last 12 months.

QSEP's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TAGP (100). This means that QSEP’s stock grew similarly to TAGP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QSEPTAGP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
81%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QSEP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TAGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MTSUY20.970.58
+2.84%
Mitsubishi Corp.
MANOF1.04N/A
N/A
Manolete Partners Plc
CGMLF1.21N/A
N/A
Chalice Mining Ltd.
BGKKF4.30N/A
N/A
Bangkok Bank Public Co Ltd.
OMMSF0.04N/A
-5.16%
Omineca Mining & Metals Ltd.

QSEP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QSEP and PLSDF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QSEP and PLSDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QSEP
1D Price
Change %
QSEP100%
-5.83%
PLSDF - QSEP
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.94%
TAGP - QSEP
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KEGX - QSEP
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PDER - QSEP
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.00%
NSFDF - QSEP
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TAGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TAGP and MRC have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TAGP and MRC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TAGP
1D Price
Change %
TAGP100%
N/A
MRC - TAGP
24%
Poorly correlated
-6.82%
QSEP - TAGP
7%
Poorly correlated
-5.83%
SAPMY - TAGP
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.15%
WYGPY - TAGP
6%
Poorly correlated
-11.58%
TOLWF - TAGP
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
More