QTEYF
Price
$0.23
Change
+$0.01 (+4.55%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
96.3M
SHASF
Price
$0.15
Change
+$0.01 (+6.67%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
426.37M
Interact to see
Advertisement

QTEYF vs SHASF

Header iconQTEYF vs SHASF Comparison
Open Charts QTEYF vs SHASFBanner chart's image
Questerre Energy
Price$0.23
Change+$0.01 (+4.55%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization96.3M
Shamaran Petroleum
Price$0.15
Change+$0.01 (+6.67%)
Volume$50K
Capitalization426.37M
QTEYF vs SHASF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
QTEYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QTEYF vs. SHASF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QTEYF is a Hold and SHASF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (QTEYF: $0.23 vs. SHASF: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: QTEYF and SHASF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QTEYF: 5% vs. SHASF: 79%
Market capitalization -- QTEYF: $96.3M vs. SHASF: $426.37M
QTEYF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $96.3M. SHASF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $426.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $116.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QTEYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSHASF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • QTEYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SHASF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SHASF is a better buy in the long-term than QTEYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QTEYF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHASF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QTEYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SHASF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QTEYF is a better buy in the short-term than SHASF.

Price Growth

QTEYF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +4.27% price change this week, while SHASF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +3.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-0.25% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHASF($426M) has a higher market cap than QTEYF($96.3M). SHASF YTD gains are higher at: 83.649 vs. QTEYF (46.563). SHASF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 161M vs. QTEYF (13.3M). SHASF has more cash in the bank: 67.2M vs. QTEYF (18.3M). QTEYF has less debt than SHASF: QTEYF (132K) vs SHASF (158M). SHASF has higher revenues than QTEYF: SHASF (135M) vs QTEYF (41.9M).
QTEYFSHASFQTEYF / SHASF
Capitalization96.3M426M23%
EBITDA13.3M161M8%
Gain YTD46.56383.64956%
P/E RatioN/A5.17-
Revenue41.9M135M31%
Total Cash18.3M67.2M27%
Total Debt132K158M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QTEYF vs SHASF: Fundamental Ratings
QTEYF
SHASF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7491
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5520
SMR RATING
1..100
9420
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4840
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
958
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SHASF's Valuation (63) in the null industry is in the same range as QTEYF (67). This means that SHASF’s stock grew similarly to QTEYF’s over the last 12 months.

SHASF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTEYF (55). This means that SHASF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTEYF’s over the last 12 months.

SHASF's SMR Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for QTEYF (94). This means that SHASF’s stock grew significantly faster than QTEYF’s over the last 12 months.

SHASF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as QTEYF (48). This means that SHASF’s stock grew similarly to QTEYF’s over the last 12 months.

SHASF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for QTEYF (95). This means that SHASF’s stock grew significantly faster than QTEYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QTEYFSHASF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QTEYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VGICX73.05N/A
N/A
JPMorgan US Value C
CILGX15.76N/A
N/A
Clarkston Institutional
TQMIX18.91N/A
N/A
AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth I
BNIVX11.76N/A
N/A
Barrow Hanley International Value I
MFCAX40.86N/A
N/A
Meridian Contrarian A

QTEYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QTEYF and MTR have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QTEYF and MTR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTEYF
1D Price
Change %
QTEYF100%
+4.63%
MTR - QTEYF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
PXPEF - QTEYF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHASF - QTEYF
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.61%
RCKHF - QTEYF
3%
Poorly correlated
+19.09%
RSRV - QTEYF
3%
Poorly correlated
-4.93%
More

SHASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHASF and PMOIF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHASF and PMOIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHASF
1D Price
Change %
SHASF100%
+3.61%
PMOIF - SHASF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STGAF - SHASF
15%
Poorly correlated
+27.36%
QTEYF - SHASF
5%
Poorly correlated
+4.63%
SQZZF - SHASF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPND - SHASF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More