It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QTRX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTNDM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QTRX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TNDM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
QTRX (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +12.50% price change this week, while TNDM (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +6.82% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -4.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.70%.
QTRX is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2026.
TNDM is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| QTRX | TNDM | QTRX / TNDM | |
| Capitalization | 263M | 1.27B | 21% |
| EBITDA | -72.89M | -179.69M | 41% |
| Gain YTD | -47.084 | -48.043 | 98% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 124M | 1B | 12% |
| Total Cash | 261M | 315M | 83% |
| Total Debt | 35.5M | 449M | 8% |
QTRX | TNDM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 32 Undervalued | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
QTRX's Valuation (32) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is significantly better than the same rating for TNDM (99) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that QTRX’s stock grew significantly faster than TNDM’s over the last 12 months.
QTRX's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as TNDM (100) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that QTRX’s stock grew similarly to TNDM’s over the last 12 months.
QTRX's SMR Rating (94) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as TNDM (98) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that QTRX’s stock grew similarly to TNDM’s over the last 12 months.
TNDM's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as QTRX (60) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that TNDM’s stock grew similarly to QTRX’s over the last 12 months.
TNDM's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as QTRX (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that TNDM’s stock grew similarly to QTRX’s over the last 12 months.
| QTRX | TNDM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 8 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 86% | 14 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTRX has been loosely correlated with TWST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QTRX jumps, then TWST could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QTRX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTRX | 100% | +1.72% | ||
| TWST - QTRX | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.74% | ||
| ILMN - QTRX | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.57% | ||
| BRKR - QTRX | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.13% | ||
| RVTY - QTRX | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.20% | ||
| CRL - QTRX | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TNDM has been loosely correlated with TFX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TNDM jumps, then TFX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TNDM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNDM | 100% | +2.04% | ||
| TFX - TNDM | 45% Loosely correlated | +3.48% | ||
| SHC - TNDM | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| AZTA - TNDM | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| A - TNDM | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| QTRX - TNDM | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.72% | ||
More | ||||