Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QUS vs RECS
QUS vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts QUS vs RECS
SPDR® MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
Price$165.77
Change-$0.06 (-0.04%)
Volume$100
Net Assets1.55B
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$38.48
Change-$0.16 (-0.41%)
Volume$100
Net Assets3.42B
QUS vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QUS vs. RECS commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QUS is a Buy and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.42B vs. QUS (1.55B). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than QUS: RECS (11.612) vs QUS (7.762). QUS was incepted earlier than RECS: QUS (10 years) vs RECS (6 years). QUS (0.15) and RECS (0.15) have comparable expense ratios . RECS has a higher turnover QUS (13.00) vs QUS (13.00).
| QUS | RECS | QUS / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 7.762 | 11.612 | 67% |
| Net Assets | 1.55B | 3.42B | 45% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.15 | 100% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 49.00 | 27% |
| Yield | 1.43 | 0.64 | 224% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QUS | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 8 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 72% | 6 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CORP | 97.34 | 0.16 | +0.16% |
| PIMCO Investment Grade Corporate Bd ETF | |||
| IBAT | 25.23 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF | |||
| CSPF | 25.81 | -0.02 | -0.09% |
| Cohen & Steers Pref & Inc Oppos Act ETF | |||
| MMD | 14.56 | -0.08 | -0.55% |
| NYLI MacKay DefinedTerm Muni Opportunities Fund | |||
| ECNS | 37.58 | -0.43 | -1.13% |
| iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | |||
QUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QUS has been loosely correlated with MA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QUS jumps, then MA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUS | 100% | +0.05% | ||
| MA - QUS | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| V - QUS | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| AVGO - QUS | 59% Loosely correlated | -3.55% | ||
| MSFT - QUS | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| AAPL - QUS | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
More | ||||