Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QUS vs RECS
QUS vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts QUS vs RECS
SPDR® MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
Price$161.23
Change+$1.09 (+0.68%)
Volume$130
Net Assets1.55B
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$36.44
Change+$0.33 (+0.91%)
Volume$1.51K
Net Assets2.95B
QUS vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QUS vs. RECS commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QUS is a Hold and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.95B vs. QUS (1.55B). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than QUS: RECS (5.286) vs QUS (4.760). QUS was incepted earlier than RECS: QUS (10 years) vs RECS (6 years). QUS (0.15) and RECS (0.15) have comparable expense ratios . RECS has a higher turnover QUS (13.00) vs QUS (13.00).
| QUS | RECS | QUS / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 4.760 | 5.286 | 90% |
| Net Assets | 1.55B | 2.95B | 52% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.15 | 100% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 49.00 | 27% |
| Yield | 1.45 | 0.69 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QUS | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 73% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QUS has been loosely correlated with MA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QUS jumps, then MA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUS | 100% | +0.67% | ||
| MA - QUS | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| V - QUS | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| AVGO - QUS | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.09% | ||
| MSFT - QUS | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.05% | ||
| AAPL - QUS | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.94% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +2.42% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +2.07% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.05% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +5.84% | ||
More | ||||