Ad is loading...
QUS vs RECS
QUS vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts QUS vs RECS
SPDR® MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
Price$161.32
Change-$1.96 (-1.20%)
Volume$9.06K
Net Assets1.46B
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$35.36
Change-$0.62 (-1.72%)
Volume$330.07K
Net Assets1.89B
QUS vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QUS vs. RECS commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QUS is a Hold and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 1.89B vs. QUS (1.46B). QUS has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: QUS (4.176) vs RECS (2.137). QUS was incepted earlier than RECS: QUS (10 years) vs RECS (5 years). RECS has a higher turnover QUS (20.00) vs QUS (20.00).
| QUS | RECS | QUS / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 4.176 | 2.137 | 195% |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 1.89B | 78% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 20.00 | 45.00 | 44% |
| Yield | 1.43 | 0.89 | 160% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QUS | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QUS has been loosely correlated with MA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QUS jumps, then MA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUS | 100% | -1.20% | ||
| MA - QUS | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| V - QUS | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.56% | ||
| AVGO - QUS | 59% Loosely correlated | -3.56% | ||
| MSFT - QUS | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.90% | ||
| AAPL - QUS | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.11% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -1.72% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -2.83% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -4.40% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -1.90% | ||
| JHG - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| LRCX - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | -3.37% | ||
More | ||||