Ad is loading...
QUS vs RECS
QUS vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts QUS vs RECS
SPDR® MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
Price$152.43
Change-$4.80 (-3.05%)
Volume$2.78K
Net Assets1.45B
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$31.81
Change-$1.77 (-5.27%)
Volume$2.19K
Net Assets2.29B
QUS vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QUS vs. RECS commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QUS is a Hold and RECS is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.29B vs. QUS (1.45B). QUS has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: QUS (-1.563) vs RECS (-8.001). QUS was incepted earlier than RECS: QUS (10 years) vs RECS (6 years). QUS (0.15) and RECS (0.15) have comparable expense ratios . RECS has a higher turnover QUS (13.00) vs QUS (13.00).
| QUS | RECS | QUS / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | -1.563 | -8.001 | 20% |
| Net Assets | 1.45B | 2.29B | 63% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.15 | 100% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 49.00 | 27% |
| Yield | 1.48 | 0.73 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QUS | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 72% | 7 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QUS has been loosely correlated with MA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QUS jumps, then MA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUS | 100% | -3.05% | ||
| MA - QUS | 62% Loosely correlated | -3.07% | ||
| V - QUS | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.00% | ||
| AVGO - QUS | 59% Loosely correlated | -10.51% | ||
| MSFT - QUS | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.36% | ||
| AAPL - QUS | 53% Loosely correlated | -9.25% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -5.15% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -8.98% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -6.05% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -2.36% | ||
| JHG - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | -11.05% | ||
| LRCX - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | -11.60% | ||
More | ||||