Ad is loading...
QUS vs RECS
QUS vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts QUS vs RECS
SPDR® MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
Price$154.59
Change-$5.22 (-3.27%)
Volume$21.97K
CapitalizationN/A
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$34.48
Change-$1.39 (-3.87%)
Volume$942
CapitalizationN/A
QUS vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QUS vs. RECS commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QUS is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 1.56B vs. QUS (1.44B). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than QUS: RECS (25.794) vs QUS (18.793). QUS was incepted earlier than RECS: QUS (10 years) vs RECS (5 years). RECS has a higher turnover QUS (20.00) vs QUS (20.00).
| QUS | RECS | QUS / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 18.793 | 25.794 | 73% |
| Net Assets | 1.44B | 1.56B | 93% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 20.00 | 45.00 | 44% |
| Yield | 1.43 | 0.89 | 160% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QUS | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 85% | 15 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 6 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QUS has been loosely correlated with MA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QUS jumps, then MA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUS | 100% | -2.45% | ||
| MA - QUS | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.08% | ||
| V - QUS | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.68% | ||
| AVGO - QUS | 59% Loosely correlated | -6.91% | ||
| MSFT - QUS | 54% Loosely correlated | -3.76% | ||
| AAPL - QUS | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.14% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -2.85% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -4.60% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -3.25% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -3.76% | ||
| JHG - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | -4.26% | ||
| LRCX - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | -3.35% | ||
More | ||||