Ad is loading...
QVML vs RECS
QVML vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts QVML vs RECS
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF
Price$32.44
Change+$0.46 (+1.44%)
Volume$100
Net Assets1.07B
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$32.32
Change+$0.67 (+2.12%)
Volume$388
Net Assets2.28B
QVML vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QVML vs. RECS commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QVML is a Buy and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.28B vs. QVML (1.07B). QVML has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: QVML (-7.073) vs RECS (-8.579). QVML was incepted earlier than RECS: QVML (4 years) vs RECS (6 years). QVML (0.11) has a lower expense ratio than RECS (0.15). RECS has a higher turnover QVML (15.00) vs QVML (15.00).
| QVML | RECS | QVML / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | -7.073 | -8.579 | 82% |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 2.28B | 47% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.11 | 0.15 | 73% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 49.00 | 31% |
| Yield | 1.23 | 0.73 | 170% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QVML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QVML has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QVML jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QVML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QVML | 100% | +1.77% | ||
| MSFT - QVML | 70% Closely correlated | +2.06% | ||
| AAPL - QVML | 69% Closely correlated | +2.43% | ||
| PH - QVML | 68% Closely correlated | +2.50% | ||
| BLK - QVML | 67% Closely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| NXPI - QVML | 67% Closely correlated | +3.56% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +1.77% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +4.28% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +2.82% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +2.06% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +2.80% | ||
More | ||||