Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QVML vs RECS
QVML vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts QVML vs RECS
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF
Price$38.53
Change-$0.54 (-1.38%)
Volume$591
Net Assets1.45B
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$39.30
Change-$0.62 (-1.55%)
Volume$884
Net Assets4.3B
QVML vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QVML vs. RECS commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QVML is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 4.3B vs. QVML (1.45B). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than QVML: RECS (15.309) vs QVML (14.160). QVML was incepted earlier than RECS: QVML (4 years) vs RECS (6 years). QVML (0.11) has a lower expense ratio than RECS (0.15). RECS has a higher turnover QVML (15.00) vs QVML (15.00).
| QVML | RECS | QVML / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 14.160 | 15.309 | 92% |
| Net Assets | 1.45B | 4.3B | 34% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.11 | 0.15 | 73% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 49.00 | 31% |
| Yield | 1.08 | 0.59 | 184% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QVML | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 82% | 9 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
QVML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that QVML and PSKY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QVML and PSKY's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QVML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QVML | 100% | +0.16% | ||
| PSKY - QVML | 26% Poorly correlated | -3.85% | ||
| FIS - QVML | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.78% | ||
| IVZ - QVML | 18% Poorly correlated | +1.15% | ||
| LLY - QVML | 17% Poorly correlated | +1.90% | ||
| JBL - QVML | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.61% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.33% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -1.35% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.05% | ||
More | ||||