Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QVML vs RECS
QVML vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts QVML vs RECS
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF
Price$38.03
Change-$0.08 (-0.21%)
Volume$2.36K
Net Assets1.35B
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$38.81
Change-$0.12 (-0.31%)
Volume$419.89K
Net Assets3.41B
QVML vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QVML vs. RECS commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QVML is a Buy and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.41B vs. QVML (1.35B). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than QVML: RECS (12.103) vs QVML (10.828). QVML was incepted earlier than RECS: QVML (4 years) vs RECS (6 years). QVML (0.11) has a lower expense ratio than RECS (0.15). RECS has a higher turnover QVML (15.00) vs QVML (15.00).
| QVML | RECS | QVML / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 10.828 | 12.103 | 89% |
| Net Assets | 1.35B | 3.41B | 39% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.11 | 0.15 | 73% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 49.00 | 31% |
| Yield | 1.15 | 0.64 | 179% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QVML | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QVML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QVML has been closely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QVML jumps, then PH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QVML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QVML | 100% | -0.21% | ||
| PH - QVML | 71% Closely correlated | -2.06% | ||
| AAPL - QVML | 71% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| KKR - QVML | 69% Closely correlated | -2.59% | ||
| PFG - QVML | 67% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| BLK - QVML | 67% Closely correlated | -2.17% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.31% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.31% | ||
More | ||||