Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QYLG vs SCHG
QYLG vs SCHG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QYLG vs. SCHG commentary
Jun 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QYLG is a Hold and SCHG is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 43.1B vs. QYLG (102M). SCHG has a higher annual dividend yield than QYLG: SCHG (2.934) vs QYLG (1.481). QYLG was incepted earlier than SCHG: QYLG (5 years) vs SCHG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than QYLG (0.35). QYLG has a higher turnover SCHG (3.00) vs SCHG (3.00).
| QYLG | SCHG | QYLG / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | 1.481 | 2.934 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 102M | 43.1B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.04 | 875% |
| Turnover | 14.82 | 3.00 | 494% |
| Yield | 5.97 | 0.41 | 1,457% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QYLG | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 77% | 7 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QYLG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QYLG has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QYLG jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QYLG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QYLG | 100% | +1.18% | ||
| CDNS - QYLG | 75% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| LRCX - QYLG | 75% Closely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| SNPS - QYLG | 74% Closely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| ARM - QYLG | 74% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| KLAC - QYLG | 74% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | +0.41% | ||
| META - SCHG | 79% Closely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| CDNS - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| SNPS - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| LRCX - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | +0.44% | ||
More | ||||