RAFA
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
5.22M
SFOSF
Price
$2.30
Change
-$0.37 (-13.86%)
Updated
Aug 4 closing price
Capitalization
9.66B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RAFA vs SFOSF

Header iconRAFA vs SFOSF Comparison
Open Charts RAFA vs SFOSFBanner chart's image
Rafarma Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (WY)
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$11.07K
Capitalization5.22M
Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical Group
Price$2.30
Change-$0.37 (-13.86%)
Volume$1.27K
Capitalization9.66B
RAFA vs SFOSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RAFA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFOSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RAFA vs. SFOSF commentary
Aug 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RAFA is a Hold and SFOSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 15, 2025
Stock price -- (RAFA: $0.06 vs. SFOSF: $2.30)
Brand notoriety: RAFA and SFOSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RAFA: 24% vs. SFOSF: 173%
Market capitalization -- RAFA: $5.22M vs. SFOSF: $9.66B
RAFA [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] is valued at $5.22M. SFOSF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] market capitalization is $9.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry ranges from $67.83B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry is $3.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RAFA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSFOSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RAFA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SFOSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both RAFA and SFOSF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RAFA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFOSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RAFA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • SFOSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFOSF is a better buy in the short-term than RAFA.

Price Growth

RAFA (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а -22.73% price change this week, while SFOSF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was +6.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +69.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +80.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (+6.43% weekly)

A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFOSF($9.66B) has a higher market cap than RAFA($5.22M). SFOSF YTD gains are higher at: 27.756 vs. RAFA (-22.977).
RAFASFOSFRAFA / SFOSF
Capitalization5.22M9.66B0%
EBITDAN/A5.91B-
Gain YTD-22.97727.756-83%
P/E RatioN/A15.01-
RevenueN/A40.3B-
Total CashN/A16.1B-
Total DebtN/A36.2B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RAFA vs SFOSF: Fundamental Ratings
RAFA
SFOSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
293
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
380
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6541
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
263
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SFOSF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RAFA (73). This means that SFOSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RAFA’s over the last 12 months.

SFOSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RAFA (100). This means that SFOSF’s stock grew similarly to RAFA’s over the last 12 months.

RAFA's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SFOSF (80). This means that RAFA’s stock grew significantly faster than SFOSF’s over the last 12 months.

SFOSF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as RAFA (65). This means that SFOSF’s stock grew similarly to RAFA’s over the last 12 months.

RAFA's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFOSF (63). This means that RAFA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFOSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RAFASFOSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RAFA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFOSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VNSE37.32N/A
N/A
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Select ETF
METD13.69-0.03
-0.18%
Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF
BKAG42.09-0.13
-0.31%
BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF
TWN47.95-0.16
-0.33%
Taiwan Fund
BAMD31.23-0.13
-0.41%
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF

RAFA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RAFA and SFOSF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RAFA and SFOSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RAFA
1D Price
Change %
RAFA100%
-7.61%
SFOSF - RAFA
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OWPC - RAFA
7%
Poorly correlated
-24.35%
RSCI - RAFA
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBFM - RAFA
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
PAIOF - RAFA
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SFOSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SFOSF and CANN have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFOSF and CANN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFOSF
1D Price
Change %
SFOSF100%
N/A
CANN - SFOSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.70%
HCM - SFOSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
MSTH - SFOSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGIOF - SFOSF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RAFA - SFOSF
9%
Poorly correlated
-7.61%
More