Advertisement
RBBN vs RCI
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RBBN is a Hold and RCI is a Buy.
RBBN | RCI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 45 Fair valued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 84 | 23 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 73 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 23 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RCI's Valuation (15) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as RBBN (45) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that RCI’s stock grew similarly to RBBN’s over the last 12 months.
RCI's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as RBBN (100) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that RCI’s stock grew similarly to RBBN’s over the last 12 months.
RCI's SMR Rating (23) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RBBN (84) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that RCI’s stock grew somewhat faster than RBBN’s over the last 12 months.
RCI's Price Growth Rating (73) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as RBBN (81) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that RCI’s stock grew similarly to RBBN’s over the last 12 months.
RBBN's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for RCI (99) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that RBBN’s stock grew significantly faster than RCI’s over the last 12 months.
| RBBN | RCI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 42% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 77% | 19 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 47% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RBBN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while RCI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- RBBN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RCI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RBBN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RCI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- RBBN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
- RCI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
RBBN (@Packaged Software) experienced а -5.49% price change this week, while RCI (@Major Telecommunications) price change was -4.77% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.25%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was -1.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.74%.
Reported Earning Dates
RBBN is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
RCI is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.04% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Major Telecommunications (-1.29% weekly)Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
Advertisement
RBBN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RBBN has been loosely correlated with S. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RBBN jumps, then S could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RBBN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBBN | 100% | -2.27% | ||
| S - RBBN | 39% Loosely correlated | +3.83% | ||
| DAVE - RBBN | 34% Loosely correlated | +5.62% | ||
| BILL - RBBN | 33% Loosely correlated | +2.91% | ||
| OTEX - RBBN | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| ROP - RBBN | 32% Poorly correlated | +3.77% | ||
More | ||||
RCI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RCI has been loosely correlated with BCE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RCI jumps, then BCE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RCI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCI | 100% | -0.26% | ||
| BCE - RCI | 39% Loosely correlated | -2.06% | ||
| LBTYA - RCI | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.30% | ||
| LBTYK - RCI | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.18% | ||
| RBBN - RCI | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.27% | ||
| TIGO - RCI | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.76% | ||
More | ||||