Ad is loading...
RBCUX vs RTEAX
RBCUX vs RTEAX Comparison
Open Charts RBCUX vs RTEAX
Russell Inv Tax-Exempt Bond M
Price$21.46
Change+$0.47 (+2.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.69B
Russell Inv Tax-Exempt Bond A
Price$21.55
Change+$0.48 (+2.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.69B
RBCUX vs RTEAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RBCUX vs. RTEAX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RBCUX is a Hold and RTEAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBCUX (5.69B) and RTEAX (5.69B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RBCUX pays higher dividends than RTEAX: RBCUX (3.65) vs RTEAX (3.25). RBCUX was incepted earlier than RTEAX: RBCUX (8 years) vs RTEAX (15 years). RTEAX (0.82) is less costly to investors than RBCUX (0.57). RBCUX (39.00) and RTEAX (39.00) have comparable annual turnover. RBCUX (0) and RTEAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RBCUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.38 vs. RTEAX (-0.81). RBCUX return over 5 years is better than : -1.23 vs. RTEAX (-2.11).
| RBCUX | RTEAX | RBCUX / RTEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.80 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.82 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.742 | -2.858 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.69B | 5.69B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.65 | 3.25 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.38 | -0.81 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.73 | 0.83 | 210% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.23 | -2.11 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -2.80 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...