Ad is loading...
RBDTX vs RFDTX
RBDTX vs RFDTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RBDTX vs. RFDTX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RBDTX is a Hold and RFDTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBDTX (32B) and RFDTX (32B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RFDTX pays higher dividends than RBDTX: RFDTX (2.80) vs RBDTX (1.76). RBDTX was incepted earlier than RFDTX: RBDTX (18 years) vs RFDTX (16 years). RBDTX (1.40) is less costly to investors than RFDTX (0.31). RBDTX (250) and RFDTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RFDTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.05 vs. RBDTX (5.80). RFDTX return over 5 years is better than : 24.13 vs. RBDTX (18.53).
| RBDTX | RFDTX | RBDTX / RFDTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.31 | 452% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.31 | 452% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.696 | 2.041 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32B | 32B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 2.80 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.80 | 7.05 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.29 | 13.47 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.53 | 24.13 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.85 | 35.09 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers