Ad is loading...
RBDTX vs TCLFX
RBDTX vs TCLFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RBDTX vs. TCLFX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RBDTX is a Hold and TCLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBDTX has more cash in the bank: 32.3B vs. TCLFX (3.36B). TCLFX pays higher dividends than RBDTX: TCLFX (2.07) vs RBDTX (1.76). RBDTX was incepted earlier than TCLFX: RBDTX (18 years) vs TCLFX (21 years). RBDTX (1.40) is less costly to investors than TCLFX (0.80). TCLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. RBDTX (10.00). TCLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBDTX: TCLFX (0) vs RBDTX (250). RBDTX (5.74) and TCLFX (5.55) have marching annual gain over last year. TCLFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.55 vs. RBDTX (22.36).
| RBDTX | TCLFX | RBDTX / TCLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.65 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.80 | 175% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.324 | 2.122 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.3B | 3.36B | 962% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 2.07 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.74 | 5.55 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.50 | 15.98 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.36 | 26.55 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.06 | 27.09 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...