Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RBDTX vs TCLFX
RBDTX vs TCLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RBDTX vs. TCLFX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RBDTX is a Hold and TCLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBDTX has more cash in the bank: 32.6B vs. TCLFX (3.35B). TCLFX pays higher dividends than RBDTX: TCLFX (1.97) vs RBDTX (1.67). RBDTX was incepted earlier than TCLFX: RBDTX (18 years) vs TCLFX (21 years). RBDTX (1.40) is less costly to investors than TCLFX (0.80). TCLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. RBDTX (10.00). TCLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBDTX: TCLFX (0) vs RBDTX (250). RBDTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.79 vs. TCLFX (4.71). TCLFX return over 5 years is better than : 19.07 vs. RBDTX (17.13).
| RBDTX | TCLFX | RBDTX / TCLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.65 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.80 | 175% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.395 | 5.658 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.6B | 3.35B | 972% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 1.97 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.79 | 4.71 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.90 | 23.66 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.13 | 19.07 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.72 | 32.29 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers