Ad is loading...
RBEMX vs RCMTX
RBEMX vs RCMTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RBEMX vs. RCMTX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RBEMX is a Hold and RCMTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBEMX (24.1B) and RCMTX (24.1B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RCMTX pays higher dividends than RBEMX: RCMTX (0.65) vs RBEMX (0.50). RBEMX was incepted earlier than RCMTX: RBEMX (11 years) vs RCMTX (15 years). RBEMX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RCMTX (1.03). RBEMX (5.00) and RCMTX (5.00) have comparable annual turnover. RBEMX (250) and RCMTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RCMTX (5.24) and RBEMX (5.08) have marching annual gain over last year. RCMTX (40.32) and RBEMX (39.52) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RBEMX | RCMTX | RBEMX / RCMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.03 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.03 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.682 | -1.671 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.1B | 24.1B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.65 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.08 | 5.24 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.73 | 17.11 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.52 | 40.32 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.64 | 59.29 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...