Ad is loading...
RBEMX vs TRRNX
RBEMX vs TRRNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RBEMX vs. TRRNX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RBEMX is a Hold and TRRNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBEMX has more cash in the bank: 24.1B vs. TRRNX (10.2B). TRRNX pays higher dividends than RBEMX: TRRNX (1.29) vs RBEMX (0.50). RBEMX was incepted earlier than TRRNX: RBEMX (11 years) vs TRRNX (18 years). RBEMX (1.19) is less costly to investors than TRRNX (0.64). TRRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.60 vs. RBEMX (5.00). RBEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRRNX: RBEMX (250) vs TRRNX (2500). TRRNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.38 vs. RBEMX (5.08). TRRNX return over 5 years is better than : 44.76 vs. RBEMX (39.52).
| RBEMX | TRRNX | RBEMX / TRRNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.64 | 186% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.64 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.682 | -1.006 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.1B | 10.2B | 236% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.29 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.08 | 6.38 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.73 | 18.15 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.52 | 44.76 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.64 | 53.44 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...