Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RBFFX vs RIGRX
RBFFX vs RIGRX Comparison
Open Charts RBFFX vs RIGRX
American Funds Bond Fund of Amer R5
Price$11.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets94.87B
Russell Inv Investment Grade Bond R6
Price$18.47
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
RBFFX vs RIGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RBFFX vs. RIGRX commentary
Aug 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RBFFX is a Hold and RIGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBFFX has more cash in the bank: 94.9B vs. RIGRX (1.02B). RIGRX pays higher dividends than RBFFX: RIGRX (4.80) vs RBFFX (4.54). RBFFX was incepted earlier than RIGRX: RBFFX (23 years) vs RIGRX (9 years). RIGRX (0.41) is less costly to investors than RBFFX (0.30). RBFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 370.00 vs. RIGRX (77.00). RIGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBFFX: RIGRX (0) vs RBFFX (250). RBFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.92 vs. RIGRX (2.53). RBFFX return over 5 years is better than : -5.78 vs. RIGRX (-8.89).
| RBFFX | RIGRX | RBFFX / RIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.38 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.41 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.880 | 4.659 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.9B | 1.02B | 9,341% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.54 | 4.80 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.92 | 2.53 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.24 | 6.34 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.78 | -8.89 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.66 | N/A | - |