Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RBFTX vs RCFTX
RBFTX vs RCFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RBFTX vs. RCFTX commentary
Jun 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RBFTX is a Hold and RCFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBFTX (50.6B) and RCFTX (50.6B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RCFTX pays higher dividends than RBFTX: RCFTX (1.34) vs RBFTX (0.94). RBFTX was incepted earlier than RCFTX: RBFTX (18 years) vs RCFTX (18 years). RBFTX (1.43) is less costly to investors than RCFTX (0.98). RBFTX (7.00) and RCFTX (7.00) have comparable annual turnover. RBFTX (250) and RCFTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RCFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.23 vs. RBFTX (8.74). RCFTX return over 5 years is better than : 35.65 vs. RBFTX (33.30).
| RBFTX | RCFTX | RBFTX / RCFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.98 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.98 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.220 | 7.388 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.6B | 50.6B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 1.34 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.74 | 9.23 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.41 | 28.80 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.30 | 35.65 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.45 | 57.78 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers