Ad is loading...
RBFTX vs RDFTX
RBFTX vs RDFTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RBFTX vs. RDFTX commentary
May 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RBFTX is a Hold and RDFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBFTX (48.3B) and RDFTX (48.3B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RDFTX pays higher dividends than RBFTX: RDFTX (1.64) vs RBFTX (0.98). RBFTX was incepted earlier than RDFTX: RBFTX (18 years) vs RDFTX (18 years). RBFTX (1.43) is less costly to investors than RDFTX (0.68). RBFTX (7.00) and RDFTX (7.00) have comparable annual turnover. RBFTX (250) and RDFTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RDFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.16 vs. RBFTX (7.27). RDFTX return over 5 years is better than : 40.61 vs. RBFTX (36.42).
| RBFTX | RDFTX | RBFTX / RDFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.68 | 210% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.68 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.760 | 1.006 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.3B | 48.3B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 1.64 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.27 | 8.16 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.18 | 16.33 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.42 | 40.61 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.81 | 50.11 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers