RBGPF
Price
$77.00
Change
+$1.45 (+1.92%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
50.85B
UNICY
Price
$3.29
Change
+$0.04 (+1.23%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
11.61B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RBGPF vs UNICY

Header iconRBGPF vs UNICY Comparison
Open Charts RBGPF vs UNICYBanner chart's image
Reckitt Benckiser Group
Price$77.00
Change+$1.45 (+1.92%)
Volume$96.22K
Capitalization50.85B
Unicharm
Price$3.29
Change+$0.04 (+1.23%)
Volume$696.52K
Capitalization11.61B
RBGPF vs UNICY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RBGPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNICY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RBGPF vs. UNICY commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RBGPF is a Buy and UNICY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (RBGPF: $77.00 vs. UNICY: $3.29)
Brand notoriety: RBGPF and UNICY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RBGPF: 1354% vs. UNICY: 102%
Market capitalization -- RBGPF: $50.85B vs. UNICY: $11.61B
RBGPF [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $50.85B. UNICY’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $11.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $364.59B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $21.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RBGPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUNICY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RBGPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UNICY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RBGPF is a better buy in the long-term than UNICY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RBGPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNICY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RBGPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UNICY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RBGPF is a better buy in the short-term than UNICY.

Price Growth

RBGPF (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +4.17% price change this week, while UNICY (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -2.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.51%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (-0.97% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBGPF($50.8B) has a higher market cap than UNICY($11.6B). RBGPF has higher P/E ratio than UNICY: RBGPF (31.13) vs UNICY (20.42). RBGPF YTD gains are higher at: 30.464 vs. UNICY (-18.362). UNICY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 179B vs. RBGPF (2.77B). UNICY has more cash in the bank: 331B vs. RBGPF (963M). RBGPF has less debt than UNICY: RBGPF (9.29B) vs UNICY (16.6B). UNICY has higher revenues than RBGPF: UNICY (965B) vs RBGPF (14B).
RBGPFUNICYRBGPF / UNICY
Capitalization50.8B11.6B438%
EBITDA2.77B179B2%
Gain YTD30.464-18.362-166%
P/E Ratio31.1320.42152%
Revenue14B965B1%
Total Cash963M331B0%
Total Debt9.29B16.6B56%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RBGPF vs UNICY: Fundamental Ratings
RBGPF
UNICY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4161
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4684
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RBGPF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as UNICY (56). This means that RBGPF’s stock grew similarly to UNICY’s over the last 12 months.

RBGPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as UNICY (100). This means that RBGPF’s stock grew similarly to UNICY’s over the last 12 months.

RBGPF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as UNICY (100). This means that RBGPF’s stock grew similarly to UNICY’s over the last 12 months.

RBGPF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UNICY (84). This means that RBGPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UNICY’s over the last 12 months.

RBGPF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as UNICY (100). This means that RBGPF’s stock grew similarly to UNICY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RBGPFUNICY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RBGPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNICY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARMH61.130.59
+0.97%
ARM HOLDINGS PLC ADRHEDGED ARMH
NUMG49.270.31
+0.63%
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
EWC48.460.09
+0.19%
iShares MSCI Canada ETF
RFCI22.650.03
+0.13%
RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF
FID19.82-0.02
-0.10%
First Trust S&P Int Div Aristocrats ETF

RBGPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RBGPF has been closely correlated with RBGLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RBGPF jumps, then RBGLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBGPF
1D Price
Change %
RBGPF100%
N/A
RBGLY - RBGPF
69%
Closely correlated
-1.32%
UNLRF - RBGPF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNCHF - RBGPF
20%
Poorly correlated
-10.58%
SPCO - RBGPF
19%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
UNICY - RBGPF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.23%
More

UNICY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNICY has been loosely correlated with UNCHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNICY jumps, then UNCHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNICY
1D Price
Change %
UNICY100%
+1.23%
UNCHF - UNICY
41%
Loosely correlated
-10.58%
KAOOY - UNICY
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
SSDOY - UNICY
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
KSRYY - UNICY
26%
Poorly correlated
+5.37%
BDRFY - UNICY
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
More