Ad is loading...
RBRI
Price
$0.21
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
SHGKY
Price
$1.58
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

RBRI vs SHGKY

Header iconRBRI vs SHGKY Comparison
Open Charts RBRI vs SHGKYBanner chart's image
RBR Global
Price$0.21
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$140
CapitalizationN/A
Sun Hung Kai & Co
Price$1.58
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$487
CapitalizationN/A
RBRI vs SHGKY Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RBRI vs. SHGKY commentary
Nov 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RBRI is a Hold and SHGKY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 19, 2024
Stock price -- (RBRI: $0.21 vs. SHGKY: $1.58)
Brand notoriety: RBRI and SHGKY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RBRI: 135% vs. SHGKY: 180%
Market capitalization -- RBRI: $195.33K vs. SHGKY: $602.62M
RBRI [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $195.33K. SHGKY’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $602.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RBRI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSHGKY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • RBRI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SHGKY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SHGKY is a better buy in the long-term than RBRI.

Price Growth

RBRI (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +5.70% price change this week, while SHGKY (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -3.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -1.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.32%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-1.33% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHGKY($603M) has a higher market cap than RBRI($195K). SHGKY YTD gains are higher at: 43.149 vs. RBRI (5.700). SHGKY has more cash in the bank: 3.69B vs. RBRI (172K). SHGKY has higher revenues than RBRI: SHGKY (5.49B) vs RBRI (0).
RBRISHGKYRBRI / SHGKY
Capitalization195K603M0%
EBITDA220KN/A-
Gain YTD5.70043.14913%
P/E RatioN/A2.42-
Revenue05.49B-
Total Cash172K3.69B0%
Total DebtN/A18.6B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RBRI: Fundamental Ratings
RBRI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LFEIX25.81-0.14
-0.54%
Federated Hermes Equity Income F
ACERX11.11-0.06
-0.54%
Invesco Equity and Income C
NWAKX19.97-0.19
-0.94%
Nationwide Janus Henderson Ovrs InsSvc
NSCFX67.22-0.78
-1.15%
Nuveen Small-Cap Value Opps R6
PGRTX16.24-0.32
-1.93%
Principal SmallCap Growth I Instl

RBRI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RBRI and FAVO have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RBRI and FAVO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBRI
1D Price
Change %
RBRI100%
N/A
FAVO - RBRI
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DWAY - RBRI
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZIZTF - RBRI
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
AIFLF - RBRI
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHGKY - RBRI
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SHGKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHGKY and IMMFF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHGKY and IMMFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHGKY
1D Price
Change %
SHGKY100%
N/A
IMMFF - SHGKY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RWAY - SHGKY
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
RBRI - SHGKY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCGFF - SHGKY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIFLF - SHGKY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More