RBSFY
Price
$6.74
Change
+$0.23 (+3.53%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
2.55B
RUBSF
Price
$32.88
Change
+$1.63 (+5.22%)
Updated
Jul 14 closing price
Capitalization
2.55B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RBSFY vs RUBSF

Header iconRBSFY vs RUBSF Comparison
Open Charts RBSFY vs RUBSFBanner chart's image
Rubis
Price$6.74
Change+$0.23 (+3.53%)
Volume$437
Capitalization2.55B
RUBIS
Price$32.88
Change+$1.63 (+5.22%)
Volume$4.45K
Capitalization2.55B
RBSFY vs RUBSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RBSFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUBSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RBSFY vs. RUBSF commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To understand the difference between Rubis - ADR (RBSFY) vs. Rubis (RUBSF) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR

ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (RBSFY: $6.74 vs. RUBSF: $32.88)
Brand notoriety: RBSFY and RUBSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil Refining/Marketing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RBSFY: 52% vs. RUBSF: 344%
Market capitalization -- RBSFY: $2.55B vs. RUBSF: $2.55B
RBSFY [@Oil Refining/Marketing] is valued at $2.55B. RUBSF’s [@Oil Refining/Marketing] market capitalization is $2.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry ranges from $73.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry is $8.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RBSFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRUBSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RBSFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RUBSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RBSFY is a better buy in the long-term than RUBSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RBSFY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUBSF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RBSFY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RUBSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both RBSFY and RUBSF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

RBSFY (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а +0.60% price change this week, while RUBSF (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price change was +5.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

RBSFY is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil Refining/Marketing (-1.39% weekly)

The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBSFY($2.55B) and RUBSF($2.55B) have the same market capitalization . RUBSF has higher P/E ratio than RBSFY: RUBSF (9.01) vs RBSFY (8.54). RBSFY YTD gains are higher at: 57.355 vs. RUBSF (38.734). RUBSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 612M vs. RBSFY (489M). RBSFY has higher revenues than RUBSF: RBSFY (7.14B) vs RUBSF (5.83B).
RBSFYRUBSFRBSFY / RUBSF
Capitalization2.55B2.55B100%
EBITDA489M612M80%
Gain YTD57.35538.734148%
P/E Ratio8.549.0195%
Revenue7.14B5.83B122%
Total CashN/A785M-
Total DebtN/A2.43B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RBSFY vs RUBSF: Fundamental Ratings
RBSFY
RUBSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8734
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
67100
SMR RATING
1..100
9361
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3945
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3756
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RBSFY's Valuation (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RUBSF (89). This means that RBSFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than RUBSF’s over the last 12 months.

RBSFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RUBSF (100). This means that RBSFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than RUBSF’s over the last 12 months.

RUBSF's SMR Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as RBSFY (93). This means that RUBSF’s stock grew similarly to RBSFY’s over the last 12 months.

RBSFY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as RUBSF (45). This means that RBSFY’s stock grew similarly to RUBSF’s over the last 12 months.

RBSFY's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as RUBSF (56). This means that RBSFY’s stock grew similarly to RUBSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RBSFYRUBSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RBSFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUBSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SECUX37.33N/A
N/A
NAA Mid Growth A
MLPLX5.93N/A
N/A
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus A
IGIIX42.03N/A
N/A
Macquarie Global Growth Fund Class I
FNIAX45.82N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor New Insights A
FFAAX16.51N/A
N/A
Franklin Global Allocation Adv

RBSFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RBSFY and NTOIY have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RBSFY and NTOIY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBSFY
1D Price
Change %
RBSFY100%
+3.45%
NTOIY - RBSFY
18%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
RUBSF - RBSFY
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTOIF - RBSFY
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
CTXAF - RBSFY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OILRF - RBSFY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RUBSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RUBSF and IDKOF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RUBSF and IDKOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUBSF
1D Price
Change %
RUBSF100%
N/A
IDKOF - RUBSF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RBSFY - RUBSF
14%
Poorly correlated
+3.45%
PKIUF - RUBSF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
CTXAF - RUBSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OILRF - RUBSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More