Advertisement
RBTEF vs SHECF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RBTEF is a Hold and SHECF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RBTEF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSHECF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- RBTEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SHECF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RBTEF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHECF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- RBTEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SHECF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
| RBTEF | SHECF | RBTEF / SHECF | |
| Capitalization | 2.01B | 56.5B | 4% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 1.05T | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.596 | -10.019 | -36% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.36 | 16.09 | 114% |
| Revenue | N/A | 2.49T | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 1.82T | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 19.8B | - |
RBTEF | SHECF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 97 Overvalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 79 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 57 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 84 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SHECF's Valuation (68) in the null industry is in the same range as RBTEF (97). This means that SHECF’s stock grew similarly to RBTEF’s over the last 12 months.
SHECF's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as RBTEF (100). This means that SHECF’s stock grew similarly to RBTEF’s over the last 12 months.
SHECF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RBTEF (57). This means that SHECF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RBTEF’s over the last 12 months.
RBTEF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as SHECF (61). This means that RBTEF’s stock grew similarly to SHECF’s over the last 12 months.
RBTEF's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as SHECF (84). This means that RBTEF’s stock grew similarly to SHECF’s over the last 12 months.
| RBTEF | SHECF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 36% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 27% | 3 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 16% | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 31% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 42% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 19% | 3 days ago 64% |
Advertisement
RBTEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RBTEF and LIN have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RBTEF and LIN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RBTEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBTEF | 100% | N/A | ||
| LIN - RBTEF | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.64% | ||
| SASOF - RBTEF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SHECF - RBTEF | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
| PECGF - RBTEF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SGLFF - RBTEF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SHECF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHECF has been loosely correlated with SKFOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHECF jumps, then SKFOF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHECF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHECF | 100% | +0.41% | ||
| SKFOF - SHECF | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| SHECY - SHECF | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.13% | ||
| HDSN - SHECF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.92% | ||
| NDEKY - SHECF | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.65% | ||
| NNXPF - SHECF | 20% Poorly correlated | -3.45% | ||
More | ||||