RCAT
Price
$5.15
Change
-$0.13 (-2.46%)
Updated
Apr 25, 02:45 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
58.61M
104 days until earnings call
TBIIF
Price
$0.23
Change
+$0.03 (+15.00%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
198.03M
Ad is loading...

RCAT vs TBIIF

Header iconRCAT vs TBIIF Comparison
Open Charts RCAT vs TBIIFBanner chart's image
Red Cat Holdings
Price$5.15
Change-$0.13 (-2.46%)
Volume$2.52K
Capitalization58.61M
Tobii Technology AB
Price$0.23
Change+$0.03 (+15.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization198.03M
RCAT vs TBIIF Comparison Chart
Loading...
RCAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RCAT vs. TBIIF commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RCAT is a Hold and TBIIF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (RCAT: $5.28 vs. TBIIF: $0.23)
Brand notoriety: RCAT and TBIIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Peripherals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RCAT: 71% vs. TBIIF: 23%
Market capitalization -- RCAT: $58.61M vs. TBIIF: $198.03M
RCAT [@Computer Peripherals] is valued at $58.61M. TBIIF’s [@Computer Peripherals] market capitalization is $198.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Peripherals] industry ranges from $262.23B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Peripherals] industry is $9.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RCAT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTBIIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RCAT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TBIIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both RCAT and TBIIF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RCAT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RCAT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

RCAT (@Computer Peripherals) experienced а +2.92% price change this week, while TBIIF (@Computer Peripherals) price change was +10.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Peripherals industry was +8.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

RCAT is expected to report earnings on Sep 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Peripherals (+8.34% weekly)

Computer peripherals connect to a computer system to add functionality or to get information from or put information into computers. Think hard disk drive, data storage systems, cloud storage devices, printer and scanner, or mouse, keyboard etc. Some of the major companies operating in the computer peripherals industry include Western Digital Corporation, Seagate Technology PLC, NetApp, Inc., Zebra Technologies Corporation, and Xerox Holdings Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TBIIF($198M) has a higher market cap than RCAT($58.6M). TBIIF YTD gains are higher at: 15.791 vs. RCAT (-58.911). RCAT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -25.72M vs. TBIIF (-111M). TBIIF has more cash in the bank: 360M vs. RCAT (7.7M). RCAT has less debt than TBIIF: RCAT (1.39M) vs TBIIF (85M). TBIIF has higher revenues than RCAT: TBIIF (792M) vs RCAT (17.9M).
RCATTBIIFRCAT / TBIIF
Capitalization58.6M198M30%
EBITDA-25.72M-111M23%
Gain YTD-58.91115.791-373%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue17.9M792M2%
Total Cash7.7M360M2%
Total Debt1.39M85M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RCAT vs TBIIF: Fundamental Ratings
RCAT
TBIIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7496
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
65100
SMR RATING
1..100
9693
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3660
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a21

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TBIIF's Valuation (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RCAT (71). This means that TBIIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RCAT’s over the last 12 months.

RCAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TBIIF (100). This means that RCAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than TBIIF’s over the last 12 months.

TBIIF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as RCAT (96). This means that TBIIF’s stock grew similarly to RCAT’s over the last 12 months.

RCAT's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as TBIIF (60). This means that RCAT’s stock grew similarly to TBIIF’s over the last 12 months.

RCAT's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as TBIIF (100). This means that RCAT’s stock grew similarly to TBIIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RCAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
RCAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LSCC49.095.19
+11.82%
Lattice Semiconductor Corp
DNOW15.980.50
+3.23%
DNOW
ASC9.370.11
+1.19%
ARDMORE SHIPPING Corp
PMVP1.080.01
+0.93%
PMV Pharmaceuticals
MDT84.300.55
+0.66%
Medtronic plc

RCAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RCAT has been loosely correlated with IONQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RCAT jumps, then IONQ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RCAT
1D Price
Change %
RCAT100%
+5.60%
IONQ - RCAT
38%
Loosely correlated
+5.93%
QBTS - RCAT
31%
Poorly correlated
+3.09%
CAN - RCAT
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
RGTI - RCAT
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.09%
UAVS - RCAT
26%
Poorly correlated
+7.55%
More

TBIIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TBIIF and RCAT have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TBIIF and RCAT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TBIIF
1D Price
Change %
TBIIF100%
+12.69%
RCAT - TBIIF
8%
Poorly correlated
+5.60%
SEKEY - TBIIF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
LNVGY - TBIIF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.09%
QUBT - TBIIF
5%
Poorly correlated
+8.95%
TSHTY - TBIIF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More