RCDTF
Price
$52.25
Change
+$0.65 (+1.26%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
RHHBF
Price
$284.70
Change
-$17.08 (-5.66%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
Ad is loading...

RCDTF vs RHHBF

Header iconRCDTF vs RHHBF Comparison
Open Charts RCDTF vs RHHBFBanner chart's image
Recordati Industria Chimica e Farmaceutica S.p.A
Price$52.25
Change+$0.65 (+1.26%)
Volume$571
CapitalizationN/A
Roche Holding
Price$284.70
Change-$17.08 (-5.66%)
Volume$25
CapitalizationN/A
RCDTF vs RHHBF Comparison Chart
Loading...
RHHBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RCDTF vs. RHHBF commentary
Dec 24, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RCDTF is a Hold and RHHBF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 24, 2024
Stock price -- (RCDTF: $52.25 vs. RHHBF: $284.70)
Brand notoriety: RCDTF and RHHBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Major industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RCDTF: 100% vs. RHHBF: 26%
Market capitalization -- RCDTF: $10.63B vs. RHHBF: $250.69B
RCDTF [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] is valued at $10.63B. RHHBF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] market capitalization is $250.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry ranges from $739.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry is $86.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RCDTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRHHBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RCDTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RHHBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RCDTF is a better buy in the long-term than RHHBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RHHBF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RHHBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

RCDTF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RHHBF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was -0.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was -1.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.38%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Major (-1.06% weekly)

The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHHBF($251B) has a higher market cap than RCDTF($10.6B). RCDTF has higher P/E ratio than RHHBF: RCDTF (26.11) vs RHHBF (21.19). RCDTF YTD gains are higher at: 13.587 vs. RHHBF (-8.457). RHHBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 19.1B vs. RCDTF (615M). RHHBF has more cash in the bank: 7.51B vs. RCDTF (231M). RCDTF has less debt than RHHBF: RCDTF (1.58B) vs RHHBF (25.4B). RHHBF has higher revenues than RCDTF: RHHBF (60B) vs RCDTF (1.99B).
RCDTFRHHBFRCDTF / RHHBF
Capitalization10.6B251B4%
EBITDA615M19.1B3%
Gain YTD13.587-8.457-161%
P/E Ratio26.1121.19123%
Revenue1.99B60B3%
Total Cash231M7.51B3%
Total Debt1.58B25.4B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RCDTF vs RHHBF: Fundamental Ratings
RCDTF
RHHBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
60100
SMR RATING
1..100
4199
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5274
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5337
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RHHBF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as RCDTF (21). This means that RHHBF’s stock grew similarly to RCDTF’s over the last 12 months.

RCDTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RHHBF (100). This means that RCDTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RHHBF’s over the last 12 months.

RCDTF's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RHHBF (99). This means that RCDTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RHHBF’s over the last 12 months.

RCDTF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as RHHBF (74). This means that RCDTF’s stock grew similarly to RHHBF’s over the last 12 months.

RHHBF's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as RCDTF (53). This means that RHHBF’s stock grew similarly to RCDTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RCDTFRHHBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
RHHBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FWRLX13.290.17
+1.30%
Fidelity Select Wireless
BAFFX41.640.47
+1.14%
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity Inst
RSECX16.180.17
+1.06%
Russell Inv US Strategic Equity C
VBIAX50.330.38
+0.76%
Vanguard Balanced Index Adm
SBASX12.680.05
+0.40%
Segall Bryant &Hamill Small Cap Cre Ins

RCDTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RCDTF has been loosely correlated with VRBCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RCDTF jumps, then VRBCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RCDTF
1D Price
Change %
RCDTF100%
N/A
VRBCF - RCDTF
56%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RHHBF - RCDTF
3%
Poorly correlated
-5.66%
RHHBY - RCDTF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
PTKFY - RCDTF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PTKFF - RCDTF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RHHBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RHHBF and RHHBY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RHHBF and RHHBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RHHBF
1D Price
Change %
RHHBF100%
-5.66%
RHHBY - RHHBF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
RHHVF - RHHBF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
NVS - RHHBF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
JNJ - RHHBF
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
ABBV - RHHBF
16%
Poorly correlated
+2.37%
More