RCDTF
Price
$65.44
Change
+$9.40 (+16.77%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
12.64B
RHHBF
Price
$327.03
Change
-$10.25 (-3.04%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
260.55B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RCDTF vs RHHBF

Header iconRCDTF vs RHHBF Comparison
Open Charts RCDTF vs RHHBFBanner chart's image
Recordati Industria Chimica e Farmaceutica S.p.A
Price$65.44
Change+$9.40 (+16.77%)
Volume$300
Capitalization12.64B
Roche Holding
Price$327.03
Change-$10.25 (-3.04%)
Volume$220
Capitalization260.55B
RCDTF vs RHHBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RHHBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RCDTF vs. RHHBF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RCDTF is a Hold and RHHBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (RCDTF: $65.44 vs. RHHBF: $327.03)
Brand notoriety: RCDTF and RHHBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Major industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RCDTF: 100% vs. RHHBF: 558%
Market capitalization -- RCDTF: $12.64B vs. RHHBF: $260.55B
RCDTF [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] is valued at $12.64B. RHHBF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] market capitalization is $260.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry ranges from $656.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry is $88.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RCDTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRHHBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RCDTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RHHBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RCDTF is a better buy in the long-term than RHHBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RHHBF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RHHBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.

Price Growth

RCDTF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RHHBF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was -3.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was -1.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.79%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Major (-1.92% weekly)

The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHHBF($261B) has a higher market cap than RCDTF($12.6B). RCDTF has higher P/E ratio than RHHBF: RCDTF (28.88) vs RHHBF (22.39). RCDTF YTD gains are higher at: 17.825 vs. RHHBF (8.582). RHHBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 18B vs. RCDTF (819M). RHHBF has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. RCDTF (342M). RCDTF has less debt than RHHBF: RCDTF (2.47B) vs RHHBF (33B). RHHBF has higher revenues than RCDTF: RHHBF (63.5B) vs RCDTF (2.48B).
RCDTFRHHBFRCDTF / RHHBF
Capitalization12.6B261B5%
EBITDA819M18B5%
Gain YTD17.8258.582208%
P/E Ratio28.8822.39129%
Revenue2.48B63.5B4%
Total Cash342M12B3%
Total Debt2.47B33B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RCDTF vs RHHBF: Fundamental Ratings
RCDTF
RHHBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
485
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
73100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4762
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RHHBF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as RCDTF (22). This means that RHHBF’s stock grew similarly to RCDTF’s over the last 12 months.

RCDTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as RHHBF (100). This means that RCDTF’s stock grew similarly to RHHBF’s over the last 12 months.

RCDTF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RHHBF (100). This means that RCDTF’s stock grew similarly to RHHBF’s over the last 12 months.

RCDTF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as RHHBF (62). This means that RCDTF’s stock grew similarly to RHHBF’s over the last 12 months.

RCDTF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RHHBF (100). This means that RCDTF’s stock grew similarly to RHHBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RCDTFRHHBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
19%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
18%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RHHBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RAYC17.730.45
+2.62%
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF
HTUS41.580.16
+0.39%
Hull Tactical US ETF
IYF125.610.17
+0.14%
iShares US Financials ETF
DNL39.460.04
+0.10%
WisdomTree Global ex-US Qual Div Gr ETF
NUMI24.350.01
+0.03%
Nuveen Municipal Income ETF

RCDTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RCDTF has been loosely correlated with VRBCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RCDTF jumps, then VRBCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RCDTF
1D Price
Change %
RCDTF100%
N/A
VRBCF - RCDTF
56%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RHHBF - RCDTF
3%
Poorly correlated
-3.04%
RHHBY - RCDTF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
PTKFY - RCDTF
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
PTKFF - RCDTF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RHHBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RHHBF and RHHBY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RHHBF and RHHBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RHHBF
1D Price
Change %
RHHBF100%
-3.04%
RHHBY - RHHBF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
RHHVF - RHHBF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
NVS - RHHBF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
JNJ - RHHBF
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
ABBV - RHHBF
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
More