Ad is loading...
RCDTX vs RFDTX
RCDTX vs RFDTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RCDTX vs. RFDTX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RCDTX is a Hold and RFDTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCDTX (32B) and RFDTX (32B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RFDTX pays higher dividends than RCDTX: RFDTX (2.79) vs RCDTX (2.17). RCDTX was incepted earlier than RFDTX: RCDTX (18 years) vs RFDTX (16 years). RCDTX (0.95) is less costly to investors than RFDTX (0.31). RCDTX (10.00) and RFDTX (10.00) have comparable annual turnover. RCDTX (250) and RFDTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RFDTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.96 vs. RCDTX (5.30). RFDTX return over 5 years is better than : 25.30 vs. RCDTX (21.86).
| RCDTX | RFDTX | RCDTX / RFDTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.31 | 306% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.31 | 306% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.478 | 2.699 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32B | 32B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.17 | 2.79 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.30 | 5.96 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.79 | 16.68 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.86 | 25.30 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.46 | 36.50 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers