RCGCF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
RDEXF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

RCGCF vs RDEXF

Header iconRCGCF vs RDEXF Comparison
Open Charts RCGCF vs RDEXFBanner chart's image
ROSCAN GOLD
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$353.1K
CapitalizationN/A
Red Pine Exploration
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$30K
CapitalizationN/A
RCGCF vs RDEXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
RCGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RDEXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RCGCF vs. RDEXF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RCGCF is a Hold and RDEXF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (RCGCF: $0.05 vs. RDEXF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: RCGCF and RDEXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RCGCF: 331% vs. RDEXF: 48%
Market capitalization -- RCGCF: $45.93M vs. RDEXF: $17.08M
RCGCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $45.93M. RDEXF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $17.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RCGCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRDEXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RCGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RDEXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RDEXF is a better buy in the long-term than RCGCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RCGCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RDEXF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RCGCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RDEXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RDEXF is a better buy in the short-term than RCGCF.

Price Growth

RCGCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -16.48% price change this week, while RDEXF (@Precious Metals) price change was -4.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -4.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.81%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-4.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCGCF($45.9M) has a higher market cap than RDEXF($17.1M). RDEXF YTD gains are higher at: -45.783 vs. RCGCF (-52.526). RCGCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -6.91M vs. RDEXF (-11.27M). RDEXF has more cash in the bank: 322K vs. RCGCF (115K). RCGCF has less debt than RDEXF: RCGCF (0) vs RDEXF (31.6K). RCGCF (0) and RDEXF (0) have equivalent revenues.
RCGCFRDEXFRCGCF / RDEXF
Capitalization45.9M17.1M268%
EBITDA-6.91M-11.27M61%
Gain YTD-52.526-45.783115%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash115K322K36%
Total Debt031.6K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RCGCF vs RDEXF: Fundamental Ratings
RCGCF
RDEXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6351
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8563
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RCGCF's Valuation (87) in the null industry is in the same range as RDEXF (88). This means that RCGCF’s stock grew similarly to RDEXF’s over the last 12 months.

RCGCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RDEXF (100). This means that RCGCF’s stock grew similarly to RDEXF’s over the last 12 months.

RCGCF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RDEXF (100). This means that RCGCF’s stock grew similarly to RDEXF’s over the last 12 months.

RDEXF's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as RCGCF (85). This means that RDEXF’s stock grew similarly to RCGCF’s over the last 12 months.

RDEXF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RCGCF (100). This means that RDEXF’s stock grew similarly to RCGCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RCGCFRDEXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
RCGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RDEXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EFU16.240.74
+4.78%
ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE
PAAA51.35-0.03
-0.05%
PGIM AAA CLO ETF
EMQQ36.03-1.22
-3.28%
EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF
PJFG96.64-3.34
-3.35%
PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF
FTXR34.41-1.30
-3.64%
First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF

RCGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RCGCF and PNCKF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RCGCF and PNCKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RCGCF
1D Price
Change %
RCGCF100%
-11.57%
PNCKF - RCGCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
AUCCF - RCGCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TORXF - RCGCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.01%
RDUFF - RCGCF
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
RDEXF - RCGCF
12%
Poorly correlated
+2.18%
More

RDEXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RDEXF and NSVLF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RDEXF and NSVLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RDEXF
1D Price
Change %
RDEXF100%
+2.18%
NSVLF - RDEXF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DTARF - RDEXF
20%
Poorly correlated
-7.53%
DC - RDEXF
20%
Poorly correlated
-6.73%
RDUFF - RDEXF
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
RCGCF - RDEXF
12%
Poorly correlated
-11.57%
More