RCGCF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
45.93M
RDUFF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
9.54M
Ad is loading...

RCGCF vs RDUFF

Header iconRCGCF vs RDUFF Comparison
Open Charts RCGCF vs RDUFFBanner chart's image
ROSCAN GOLD
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$82.79K
Capitalization45.93M
Radius Gold
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization9.54M
RCGCF vs RDUFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
RCGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RDUFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RCGCF vs. RDUFF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RCGCF is a Hold and RDUFF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (RCGCF: $0.04 vs. RDUFF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: RCGCF and RDUFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RCGCF: 100% vs. RDUFF: 0%
Market capitalization -- RCGCF: $45.93M vs. RDUFF: $9.54M
RCGCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $45.93M. RDUFF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $9.54M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RCGCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRDUFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RCGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RDUFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RDUFF is a better buy in the long-term than RCGCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RCGCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RDUFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RCGCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • RDUFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RCGCF is a better buy in the short-term than RDUFF.

Price Growth

RCGCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -24.49% price change this week, while RDUFF (@Precious Metals) price change was +4.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.47%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.38% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCGCF($45.9M) has a higher market cap than RDUFF($9.54M). RDUFF YTD gains are higher at: 40.998 vs. RCGCF (-13.349). RDUFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -289.11K vs. RCGCF (-6.91M). RDUFF has more cash in the bank: 3.48M vs. RCGCF (115K). RCGCF has less debt than RDUFF: RCGCF (0) vs RDUFF (119K). RCGCF (0) and RDUFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
RCGCFRDUFFRCGCF / RDUFF
Capitalization45.9M9.54M481%
EBITDA-6.91M-289.11K2,391%
Gain YTD-13.34940.998-33%
P/E RatioN/A18.80-
Revenue00-
Total Cash115K3.48M3%
Total Debt0119K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RCGCF vs RDUFF: Fundamental Ratings
RCGCF
RDUFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9347
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RDUFF's Valuation (76) in the null industry is in the same range as RCGCF (87). This means that RDUFF’s stock grew similarly to RCGCF’s over the last 12 months.

RDUFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RCGCF (100). This means that RDUFF’s stock grew similarly to RCGCF’s over the last 12 months.

RDUFF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as RCGCF (100). This means that RDUFF’s stock grew similarly to RCGCF’s over the last 12 months.

RDUFF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RCGCF (93). This means that RDUFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RCGCF’s over the last 12 months.

RDUFF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RCGCF (100). This means that RDUFF’s stock grew similarly to RCGCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RCGCFRDUFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
81%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
RCGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RDUFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HIADX24.020.12
+0.50%
Hartford Dividend and Growth HLS IA
NFFFX77.580.35
+0.45%
American Funds New World F2
BMSRX14.490.06
+0.42%
MFS Blended Research Mid Cap Eq R1
AHSZX21.530.02
+0.09%
Alger Health Sciences Z
CHTTX20.76-0.02
-0.10%
AMG River Road Mid Cap Value N

RCGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RCGCF and PNCKF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RCGCF and PNCKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RCGCF
1D Price
Change %
RCGCF100%
-5.13%
PNCKF - RCGCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.31%
AUCCF - RCGCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TORXF - RCGCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
RDUFF - RCGCF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RDEXF - RCGCF
12%
Poorly correlated
+3.94%
More

RDUFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RDUFF and EDVMF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RDUFF and EDVMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RDUFF
1D Price
Change %
RDUFF100%
N/A
EDVMF - RDUFF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
GOTRF - RDUFF
24%
Poorly correlated
-5.48%
SILV - RDUFF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
GOLD - RDUFF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.59%
ORLA - RDUFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.49%
More