Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RCGHX vs SHSAX
RCGHX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RCGHX vs. SHSAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RCGHX is a Hold and SHSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.58B vs. RCGHX (103M). SHSAX pays higher dividends than RCGHX: SHSAX (0.21) vs RCGHX (0.00). RCGHX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: RCGHX (24 years) vs SHSAX (26 years). RCGHX (2.16) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). SHSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. RCGHX (8.00). SHSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCGHX: SHSAX (1000) vs RCGHX (2500). RCGHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.56 vs. SHSAX (-0.09). SHSAX return over 5 years is better than : -7.39 vs. RCGHX (-38.38).
| RCGHX | SHSAX | RCGHX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.16 | 1.09 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.16 | 1.09 | 198% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.655 | 7.047 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 103M | 6.58B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.56 | -0.09 | -3,790% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.98 | 3.89 | -257% |
| Returns for 5 years | -38.38 | -7.39 | 519% |
| Returns for 10 years | -44.39 | 27.96 | -159% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement