Ad is loading...
RCGHX vs SHSAX
RCGHX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RCGHX vs. SHSAX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RCGHX is a Hold and SHSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.74B vs. RCGHX (106M). SHSAX pays higher dividends than RCGHX: SHSAX (0.21) vs RCGHX (0.00). RCGHX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: RCGHX (23 years) vs SHSAX (25 years). RCGHX (2.14) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). SHSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. RCGHX (6.00). SHSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCGHX: SHSAX (1000) vs RCGHX (2500). SHSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.32 vs. RCGHX (-14.40). SHSAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.22 vs. RCGHX (-35.58).
| RCGHX | SHSAX | RCGHX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 1.09 | 196% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 1.09 | 196% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.269 | -1.906 | 329% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 106M | 6.74B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.40 | -10.32 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | -28.44 | -14.81 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.58 | 1.22 | -2,918% |
| Returns for 10 years | -52.61 | 12.86 | -409% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers