Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RCGTX vs SLMCX
RCGTX vs SLMCX Comparison
Open Charts RCGTX vs SLMCX
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology C
Price$16.56
Change+$0.16 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.63B
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info A
Price$165.80
Change+$1.89 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.9B
RCGTX vs SLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RCGTX vs. SLMCX commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RCGTX is a Hold and SLMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMCX has more cash in the bank: 17.9B vs. RCGTX (1.63B). RCGTX (0.00) and SLMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RCGTX was incepted earlier than SLMCX: RCGTX (24 years) vs SLMCX (42 years). RCGTX (2.17) is less costly to investors than SLMCX (1.16). SLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RCGTX (2.00). SLMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCGTX: SLMCX (2000) vs RCGTX (2500). RCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.30 vs. SLMCX (19.12). SLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 60.07 vs. RCGTX (-68.69).
| RCGTX | SLMCX | RCGTX / SLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.16 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.16 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.876 | 31.750 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.63B | 17.9B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.30 | 19.12 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.14 | 73.71 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | -68.69 | 60.07 | -114% |
| Returns for 10 years | -67.43 | 166.95 | -40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement