RCIAF vs SCMWY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RCIAF is a StrongSell and SCMWY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RCIAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSCMWY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- RCIAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SCMWY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RCIAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCMWY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- RCIAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SCMWY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
RCIAF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а -6.61% price change this week, while SCMWY (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was -2.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was -2.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +83.86%.
Reported Earning Dates
SCMWY is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Wireless Telecommunications (-2.34% weekly)Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.
| RCIAF | SCMWY | RCIAF / SCMWY | |
| Capitalization | 23.2B | 33.4B | 69% |
| EBITDA | 6.55B | 4.43B | 148% |
| Gain YTD | -28.335 | -3.206 | 884% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.96 | 18.15 | 116% |
| Revenue | 16.8B | 11.1B | 151% |
| Total Cash | 359M | 581M | 62% |
| Total Debt | 46.2B | 1.89B | 2,448% |
RCIAF | SCMWY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 89 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 32 Undervalued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 35 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 59 | 57 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 72 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 53 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 55 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RCIAF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCMWY (88). This means that RCIAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCMWY’s over the last 12 months.
SCMWY's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RCIAF (100). This means that SCMWY’s stock grew somewhat faster than RCIAF’s over the last 12 months.
SCMWY's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as RCIAF (59). This means that SCMWY’s stock grew similarly to RCIAF’s over the last 12 months.
SCMWY's Price Growth Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as RCIAF (81). This means that SCMWY’s stock grew similarly to RCIAF’s over the last 12 months.
SCMWY's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RCIAF (95). This means that SCMWY’s stock grew somewhat faster than RCIAF’s over the last 12 months.
| RCIAF | SCMWY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 35% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 12% | 2 days ago 36% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 36% | 2 days ago 35% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 18% | 2 days ago 46% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 36% | 2 days ago 38% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 37% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 40% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% | 3 days ago 37% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 27% | 2 days ago 20% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 31% | 2 days ago 39% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TAAHX | 36.00 | -0.12 | -0.33% |
| Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced R | |||
| VCSOX | 24.32 | -0.11 | -0.45% |
| VALIC Company I Intl Sclly Rspnb | |||
| MSIBX | 15.82 | -0.08 | -0.50% |
| Morgan Stanley Inst Passport ovrs eq A | |||
| JFNIX | 67.99 | -0.42 | -0.61% |
| Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences I | |||
| RYVAX | 193.18 | -1.71 | -0.88% |
| Rydex Energy Services H | |||
RCIAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RCIAF has been loosely correlated with TLSNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RCIAF jumps, then TLSNF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RCIAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCIAF | 100% | -1.94% | ||
| TLSNF - RCIAF | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| FNCTF - RCIAF | 26% Poorly correlated | -5.24% | ||
| QBCRF - RCIAF | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.32% | ||
| SCMWY - RCIAF | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.14% | ||
| SGAPY - RCIAF | 0% Poorly correlated | -1.00% | ||
More | ||||
SCMWY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCMWY has been loosely correlated with SWZCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCMWY jumps, then SWZCF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCMWY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCMWY | 100% | +0.14% | ||
| SWZCF - SCMWY | 47% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| VOD - SCMWY | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.36% | ||
| TLSNY - SCMWY | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.93% | ||
| DTEGY - SCMWY | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.69% | ||
| KKPNY - SCMWY | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.54% | ||
More | ||||