Ad is loading...
RCIAF
Price
$38.91
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
SGAPY
Price
$23.41
Change
-$0.09 (-0.38%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
87 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

RCIAF vs SGAPY

Header iconRCIAF vs SGAPY Comparison
Open Charts RCIAF vs SGAPYBanner chart's image
Rogers Communications
Price$38.91
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
Singapore Telecommunications
Price$23.41
Change-$0.09 (-0.38%)
Volume$33.68K
CapitalizationN/A
RCIAF vs SGAPY Comparison Chart
Loading...
SGAPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RCIAF vs. SGAPY commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RCIAF is a Hold and SGAPY is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (RCIAF: $38.90 vs. SGAPY: $23.41)
Brand notoriety: RCIAF and SGAPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RCIAF: 155% vs. SGAPY: 148%
Market capitalization -- RCIAF: $23.22B vs. SGAPY: $32.77B
RCIAF [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $23.22B. SGAPY’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $32.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RCIAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSGAPY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RCIAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SGAPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SGAPY is a better buy in the long-term than RCIAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SGAPY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SGAPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

RCIAF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а -4.64% price change this week, while SGAPY (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was -3.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +9.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +62.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

SGAPY is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+9.09% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGAPY($32.8B) has a higher market cap than RCIAF($23.2B). RCIAF has higher P/E ratio than SGAPY: RCIAF (20.96) vs SGAPY (19.88). SGAPY YTD gains are higher at: 28.742 vs. RCIAF (-15.332). RCIAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.55B vs. SGAPY (5.57B). SGAPY has more cash in the bank: 1.67B vs. RCIAF (359M). SGAPY has less debt than RCIAF: SGAPY (10.9B) vs RCIAF (46.2B). RCIAF has higher revenues than SGAPY: RCIAF (16.8B) vs SGAPY (14.6B).
RCIAFSGAPYRCIAF / SGAPY
Capitalization23.2B32.8B71%
EBITDA6.55B5.57B118%
Gain YTD-15.33228.742-53%
P/E Ratio20.9619.88105%
Revenue16.8B14.6B115%
Total Cash359M1.67B22%
Total Debt46.2B10.9B424%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RCIAF vs SGAPY: Fundamental Ratings
RCIAF
SGAPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10055
SMR RATING
1..100
5996
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7245
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
933
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5544

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RCIAF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is in the same range as SGAPY (43). This means that RCIAF’s stock grew similarly to SGAPY’s over the last 12 months.

SGAPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RCIAF (100). This means that SGAPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than RCIAF’s over the last 12 months.

RCIAF's SMR Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGAPY (96). This means that RCIAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGAPY’s over the last 12 months.

SGAPY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as RCIAF (72). This means that SGAPY’s stock grew similarly to RCIAF’s over the last 12 months.

SGAPY's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RCIAF (93). This means that SGAPY’s stock grew significantly faster than RCIAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SGAPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SGAPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HILAX18.36-0.02
-0.11%
Hartford International Value A
DHIIX17.53-0.07
-0.40%
Diamond Hill International I
ABVIX19.58-0.09
-0.46%
AB Large Cap Value I
RISRX11.72-0.16
-1.35%
RBC International Small Cap Equity R6
GLCUX36.40-0.83
-2.23%
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts R6

RCIAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RCIAF has been loosely correlated with TLSNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RCIAF jumps, then TLSNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RCIAF
1D Price
Change %
RCIAF100%
N/A
TLSNF - RCIAF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FNCTF - RCIAF
26%
Poorly correlated
-5.42%
QBCRF - RCIAF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCMWY - RCIAF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
SGAPY - RCIAF
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
More

SGAPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGAPY has been loosely correlated with SKM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGAPY jumps, then SKM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGAPY
1D Price
Change %
SGAPY100%
-0.38%
SKM - SGAPY
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
RCI - SGAPY
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
KT - SGAPY
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
TLGPY - SGAPY
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
CHT - SGAPY
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
More