RCIAF
Price
$35.57
Change
-$0.93 (-2.55%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
19.14B
SGAPY
Price
$33.06
Change
-$0.05 (-0.15%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
54.94B
47 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

RCIAF vs SGAPY

Header iconRCIAF vs SGAPY Comparison
Open Charts RCIAF vs SGAPYBanner chart's image
Rogers Communications
Price$35.57
Change-$0.93 (-2.55%)
Volume$230
Capitalization19.14B
Singapore Telecommunications
Price$33.06
Change-$0.05 (-0.15%)
Volume$78.15K
Capitalization54.94B
RCIAF vs SGAPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RCIAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGAPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RCIAF vs. SGAPY commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RCIAF is a Hold and SGAPY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (RCIAF: $35.57 vs. SGAPY: $33.06)
Brand notoriety: RCIAF and SGAPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RCIAF: 71% vs. SGAPY: 92%
Market capitalization -- RCIAF: $19.14B vs. SGAPY: $54.94B
RCIAF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $19.14B. SGAPY’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $54.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $267.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RCIAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSGAPY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RCIAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SGAPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SGAPY is a better buy in the long-term than RCIAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RCIAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SGAPY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RCIAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SGAPY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RCIAF is a better buy in the short-term than SGAPY.

Price Growth

RCIAF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -3.54% price change this week, while SGAPY (@Major Telecommunications) price change was -2.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

SGAPY is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (-1.09% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGAPY($54.9B) has a higher market cap than RCIAF($19.1B). SGAPY (17.74) and RCIAF (17.65) have similar P/E ratio . SGAPY YTD gains are higher at: 54.623 vs. RCIAF (7.792). RCIAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.01B vs. SGAPY (7.45B). RCIAF has higher revenues than SGAPY: RCIAF (20.8B) vs SGAPY (14.1B).
RCIAFSGAPYRCIAF / SGAPY
Capitalization19.1B54.9B35%
EBITDA9.01B7.45B121%
Gain YTD7.79254.62314%
P/E Ratio17.6517.7499%
Revenue20.8B14.1B148%
Total Cash6.96BN/A-
Total Debt45.4BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RCIAF vs SGAPY: Fundamental Ratings
RCIAF
SGAPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7850
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1002
SMR RATING
1..100
5796
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5344
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9399
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RCIAF's Valuation (38) in the null industry is in the same range as SGAPY (56). This means that RCIAF’s stock grew similarly to SGAPY’s over the last 12 months.

SGAPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RCIAF (100). This means that SGAPY’s stock grew significantly faster than RCIAF’s over the last 12 months.

RCIAF's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGAPY (96). This means that RCIAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGAPY’s over the last 12 months.

SGAPY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as RCIAF (53). This means that SGAPY’s stock grew similarly to RCIAF’s over the last 12 months.

RCIAF's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as SGAPY (99). This means that RCIAF’s stock grew similarly to SGAPY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RCIAFSGAPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
18%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
19%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RCIAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGAPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AFIF9.380.02
+0.21%
Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF
NUKZ65.06-0.02
-0.03%
Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF
IBII26.29-0.06
-0.22%
iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term Tips ETF
AVUV99.44-0.74
-0.74%
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
MSTU4.11-0.65
-13.66%
T-REX 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF

RCIAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RCIAF has been loosely correlated with TLSNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RCIAF jumps, then TLSNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RCIAF
1D Price
Change %
RCIAF100%
N/A
TLSNF - RCIAF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FNCTF - RCIAF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QBCRF - RCIAF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
SCMWY - RCIAF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
SGAPY - RCIAF
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
More

SGAPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGAPY has been loosely correlated with SKM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGAPY jumps, then SKM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGAPY
1D Price
Change %
SGAPY100%
-0.14%
SKM - SGAPY
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
RCI - SGAPY
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
KT - SGAPY
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.77%
TLGPY - SGAPY
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
CHT - SGAPY
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
More