RCIAF
Price
$37.00
Change
+$0.10 (+0.27%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
19.33B
SGAPY
Price
$31.94
Change
+$0.39 (+1.24%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
52.9B
88 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

RCIAF vs SGAPY

Header iconRCIAF vs SGAPY Comparison
Open Charts RCIAF vs SGAPYBanner chart's image
Rogers Communications
Price$37.00
Change+$0.10 (+0.27%)
Volume$114
Capitalization19.33B
Singapore Telecommunications
Price$31.94
Change+$0.39 (+1.24%)
Volume$30.31K
Capitalization52.9B
RCIAF vs SGAPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RCIAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGAPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RCIAF vs. SGAPY commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RCIAF is a Buy and SGAPY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (RCIAF: $37.00 vs. SGAPY: $31.94)
Brand notoriety: RCIAF and SGAPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RCIAF: 11% vs. SGAPY: 30%
Market capitalization -- RCIAF: $19.33B vs. SGAPY: $52.9B
RCIAF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $19.33B. SGAPY’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $52.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $286.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RCIAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSGAPY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RCIAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SGAPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both RCIAF and SGAPY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RCIAF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SGAPY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RCIAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SGAPY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SGAPY is a better buy in the short-term than RCIAF.

Price Growth

RCIAF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +0.27% price change this week, while SGAPY (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +3.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

SGAPY is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+1.92% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGAPY($52.9B) has a higher market cap than RCIAF($19.3B). RCIAF has higher P/E ratio than SGAPY: RCIAF (18.24) vs SGAPY (17.09). SGAPY YTD gains are higher at: 45.455 vs. RCIAF (12.121). RCIAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.01B vs. SGAPY (7.45B). RCIAF has higher revenues than SGAPY: RCIAF (20.8B) vs SGAPY (14.1B).
RCIAFSGAPYRCIAF / SGAPY
Capitalization19.3B52.9B36%
EBITDA9.01B7.45B121%
Gain YTD12.12145.45527%
P/E Ratio18.2417.09107%
Revenue20.8B14.1B148%
Total Cash6.96BN/A-
Total Debt45.4BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RCIAF vs SGAPY: Fundamental Ratings
RCIAF
SGAPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4869
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1002
SMR RATING
1..100
5795
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4243
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9398
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
250

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RCIAF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is in the same range as SGAPY (52). This means that RCIAF’s stock grew similarly to SGAPY’s over the last 12 months.

SGAPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RCIAF (100). This means that SGAPY’s stock grew significantly faster than RCIAF’s over the last 12 months.

RCIAF's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGAPY (95). This means that RCIAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGAPY’s over the last 12 months.

RCIAF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as SGAPY (43). This means that RCIAF’s stock grew similarly to SGAPY’s over the last 12 months.

RCIAF's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as SGAPY (98). This means that RCIAF’s stock grew similarly to SGAPY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RCIAFSGAPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RCIAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGAPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NVA11.440.16
+1.42%
Nova Minerals Limited
AEG7.50-0.01
-0.13%
Aegon Ltd
PL6.78-0.04
-0.59%
Planet Labs PBC
TECX23.51-0.96
-3.92%
Tectonic Therapeutic Inc.
TAOP3.70-0.22
-5.67%
Taoping Inc

RCIAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RCIAF has been loosely correlated with TLSNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RCIAF jumps, then TLSNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RCIAF
1D Price
Change %
RCIAF100%
N/A
TLSNF - RCIAF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FNCTF - RCIAF
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.00%
QBCRF - RCIAF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCMWY - RCIAF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
SGAPY - RCIAF
0%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
More

SGAPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGAPY has been loosely correlated with SKM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGAPY jumps, then SKM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGAPY
1D Price
Change %
SGAPY100%
+1.24%
SKM - SGAPY
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
RCI - SGAPY
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
KT - SGAPY
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
TLGPY - SGAPY
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.04%
CHT - SGAPY
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
More