RCIAF
Price
$36.97
Change
-$0.03 (-0.08%)
Updated
Aug 18 closing price
Capitalization
19.65B
TLSNF
Price
$3.75
Change
+$0.07 (+1.90%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
14.89B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RCIAF vs TLSNF

Header iconRCIAF vs TLSNF Comparison
Open Charts RCIAF vs TLSNFBanner chart's image
Rogers Communications
Price$36.97
Change-$0.03 (-0.08%)
Volume$107
Capitalization19.65B
Telia Company AB
Price$3.75
Change+$0.07 (+1.90%)
Volume$4.5K
Capitalization14.89B
RCIAF vs TLSNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RCIAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLSNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RCIAF vs. TLSNF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RCIAF is a Hold and TLSNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (RCIAF: $36.97 vs. TLSNF: $3.75)
Brand notoriety: RCIAF and TLSNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RCIAF: 16% vs. TLSNF: 118%
Market capitalization -- RCIAF: $19.65B vs. TLSNF: $14.89B
RCIAF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $19.65B. TLSNF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $14.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $284.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RCIAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTLSNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RCIAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TLSNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RCIAF is a better buy in the long-term than TLSNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RCIAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TLSNF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RCIAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • TLSNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RCIAF is a better buy in the short-term than TLSNF.

Price Growth

RCIAF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TLSNF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +1.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (-0.28% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCIAF($19.6B) has a higher market cap than TLSNF($14.9B). TLSNF has higher P/E ratio than RCIAF: TLSNF (25.99) vs RCIAF (18.27). TLSNF YTD gains are higher at: 31.119 vs. RCIAF (12.030). TLSNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 31.1B vs. RCIAF (9.01B). TLSNF has more cash in the bank: 9.78B vs. RCIAF (6.96B). RCIAF has less debt than TLSNF: RCIAF (45.4B) vs TLSNF (90B). TLSNF has higher revenues than RCIAF: TLSNF (89.4B) vs RCIAF (20.8B).
RCIAFTLSNFRCIAF / TLSNF
Capitalization19.6B14.9B132%
EBITDA9.01B31.1B29%
Gain YTD12.03031.11939%
P/E Ratio18.2725.9970%
Revenue20.8B89.4B23%
Total Cash6.96B9.78B71%
Total Debt45.4B90B50%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RCIAF vs TLSNF: Fundamental Ratings
RCIAF
TLSNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9588
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
5676
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4850
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
89100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1850

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RCIAF's Valuation (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TLSNF (94). This means that RCIAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TLSNF’s over the last 12 months.

RCIAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TLSNF (100). This means that RCIAF’s stock grew similarly to TLSNF’s over the last 12 months.

RCIAF's SMR Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as TLSNF (76). This means that RCIAF’s stock grew similarly to TLSNF’s over the last 12 months.

RCIAF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as TLSNF (50). This means that RCIAF’s stock grew similarly to TLSNF’s over the last 12 months.

RCIAF's P/E Growth Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as TLSNF (100). This means that RCIAF’s stock grew similarly to TLSNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RCIAFTLSNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RCIAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLSNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSCQ28.680.09
+0.32%
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (Oct) ETF
MYMG24.64N/A
N/A
SPDR SSGA My2027 Municipal Bond ETF
IYW182.84-0.03
-0.02%
iShares US Technology ETF
SEIM43.67-0.12
-0.27%
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momt Fac ETF
IDE12.31-0.06
-0.49%
Voya Infrastructure Industrials AND Materials Fund

RCIAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RCIAF has been loosely correlated with TLSNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RCIAF jumps, then TLSNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RCIAF
1D Price
Change %
RCIAF100%
N/A
TLSNF - RCIAF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FNCTF - RCIAF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QBCRF - RCIAF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCMWY - RCIAF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.16%
SGAPY - RCIAF
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
More

TLSNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TLSNF has been loosely correlated with RCIAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TLSNF jumps, then RCIAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TLSNF
1D Price
Change %
TLSNF100%
N/A
RCIAF - TLSNF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PTTWF - TLSNF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIAOF - TLSNF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRAGF - TLSNF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TLSNY - TLSNF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
More