Ad is loading...
RCMFX vs VEXAX
RCMFX vs VEXAX Comparison
Open Charts RCMFX vs VEXAX
Schwartz Value Focused
Price$54.53
Change-$3.66 (-6.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.26M
Vanguard Extended Market Index Admiral
Price$124.41
Change-$9.34 (-6.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.09B
RCMFX vs VEXAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RCMFX vs. VEXAX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RCMFX is a Buy and VEXAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEXAX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. RCMFX (84.3M). VEXAX pays higher dividends than RCMFX: VEXAX (1.29) vs RCMFX (0.38). RCMFX was incepted earlier than VEXAX: RCMFX (41 years) vs VEXAX (24 years). RCMFX (1.29) is less costly to investors than VEXAX (0.05). RCMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. VEXAX (11.00). RCMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEXAX: RCMFX (2500) vs VEXAX (3000). RCMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.16 vs. VEXAX (2.77). RCMFX return over 5 years is better than : 189.24 vs. VEXAX (114.58).
| RCMFX | VEXAX | RCMFX / VEXAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.05 | 2,520% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.05 | 2,580% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.355 | -7.091 | -146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 84.3M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 1.29 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.16 | 2.77 | 871% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.92 | 5.57 | 752% |
| Returns for 5 years | 189.24 | 114.58 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.41 | 96.66 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers