Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RDCCX vs RWEBX
RDCCX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts RDCCX vs RWEBX
Columbia Disciplined Value C
Price$8.77
Change-$0.04 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets178.79M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.91
Change-$0.17 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.3B
RDCCX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RDCCX vs. RWEBX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDCCX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. RDCCX (179M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than RDCCX: RWEBX (0.76) vs RDCCX (0.63). RDCCX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: RDCCX (17 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RDCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RDCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDCCX: RWEBX (250) vs RDCCX (2000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.21 vs. RDCCX (-0.81). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 48.18 vs. RDCCX (11.03).
| RDCCX | RWEBX | RDCCX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 1.06 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.06 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.263 | 10.050 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 179M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.76 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.81 | 6.21 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.44 | 42.84 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.03 | 48.18 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.06 | 76.27 | 4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers