Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RDCCX vs RWEBX
RDCCX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts RDCCX vs RWEBX
Columbia Disciplined Value C
Price$8.67
Change-$0.04 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets174.54M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.77
Change+$0.23 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.68B
RDCCX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RDCCX vs. RWEBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDCCX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. RDCCX (175M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than RDCCX: RWEBX (0.76) vs RDCCX (0.63). RDCCX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: RDCCX (17 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RDCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RDCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDCCX: RWEBX (250) vs RDCCX (2000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.78 vs. RDCCX (-5.12). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 40.82 vs. RDCCX (5.05).
| RDCCX | RWEBX | RDCCX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 1.06 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.06 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.011 | 8.175 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 175M | 204B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.76 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.12 | 3.78 | -135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.09 | 27.15 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.05 | 40.82 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.43 | 66.81 | -1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement