RDEXF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
RDUFF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

RDEXF vs RDUFF

Header iconRDEXF vs RDUFF Comparison
Open Charts RDEXF vs RDUFFBanner chart's image
Red Pine Exploration
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$30K
CapitalizationN/A
Radius Gold
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$74.12K
CapitalizationN/A
RDEXF vs RDUFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
RDEXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RDUFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RDEXF vs. RDUFF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDEXF is a Hold and RDUFF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (RDEXF: $0.08 vs. RDUFF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: RDEXF and RDUFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RDEXF: 48% vs. RDUFF: 158%
Market capitalization -- RDEXF: $17.08M vs. RDUFF: $9.54M
RDEXF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $17.08M. RDUFF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $9.54M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RDEXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRDUFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RDEXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RDUFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both RDEXF and RDUFF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RDEXF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RDUFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RDEXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RDUFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RDEXF is a better buy in the short-term than RDUFF.

Price Growth

RDEXF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -4.87% price change this week, while RDUFF (@Precious Metals) price change was +12.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -4.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.81%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-4.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDEXF($17.1M) has a higher market cap than RDUFF($9.54M). RDEXF YTD gains are higher at: -45.783 vs. RDUFF (-57.769). RDUFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -289.11K vs. RDEXF (-11.27M). RDUFF has more cash in the bank: 3.48M vs. RDEXF (322K). RDEXF has less debt than RDUFF: RDEXF (31.6K) vs RDUFF (119K). RDEXF (0) and RDUFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
RDEXFRDUFFRDEXF / RDUFF
Capitalization17.1M9.54M179%
EBITDA-11.27M-289.11K3,900%
Gain YTD-45.783-57.76979%
P/E RatioN/A18.80-
Revenue00-
Total Cash322K3.48M9%
Total Debt31.6K119K27%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RDEXF vs RDUFF: Fundamental Ratings
RDEXF
RDUFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5113
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6363
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RDUFF's Valuation (75) in the null industry is in the same range as RDEXF (88). This means that RDUFF’s stock grew similarly to RDEXF’s over the last 12 months.

RDUFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RDEXF (100). This means that RDUFF’s stock grew similarly to RDEXF’s over the last 12 months.

RDUFF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as RDEXF (100). This means that RDUFF’s stock grew similarly to RDEXF’s over the last 12 months.

RDUFF's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as RDEXF (63). This means that RDUFF’s stock grew similarly to RDEXF’s over the last 12 months.

RDUFF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RDEXF (100). This means that RDUFF’s stock grew similarly to RDEXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RDEXFRDUFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
RDEXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RDUFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EFU16.240.74
+4.78%
ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE
PAAA51.35-0.03
-0.05%
PGIM AAA CLO ETF
EMQQ36.03-1.22
-3.28%
EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF
PJFG96.64-3.34
-3.35%
PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF
FTXR34.41-1.30
-3.64%
First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF

RDEXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RDEXF and NSVLF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RDEXF and NSVLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RDEXF
1D Price
Change %
RDEXF100%
+2.18%
NSVLF - RDEXF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DTARF - RDEXF
20%
Poorly correlated
-7.53%
DC - RDEXF
20%
Poorly correlated
-6.73%
RDUFF - RDEXF
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
RCGCF - RDEXF
12%
Poorly correlated
-11.57%
More