RDGL
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
23.83M
SAFLY
Price
$2.23
Change
-$0.27 (-10.80%)
Updated
Dec 5 closing price
Capitalization
529.04M
Ad is loading...

RDGL vs SAFLY

Header iconRDGL vs SAFLY Comparison
Open Charts RDGL vs SAFLYBanner chart's image
Vivos
Price$0.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$293.54K
Capitalization23.83M
Safilo Group Spa
Price$2.23
Change-$0.27 (-10.80%)
Volume$400
Capitalization529.04M
RDGL vs SAFLY Comparison Chart
Loading...
RDGL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAFLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RDGL vs. SAFLY commentary
Jan 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDGL is a Hold and SAFLY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 31, 2025
Stock price -- (RDGL: $0.12 vs. SAFLY: $2.23)
Brand notoriety: RDGL and SAFLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RDGL: 22% vs. SAFLY: 83%
Market capitalization -- RDGL: $23.83M vs. SAFLY: $529.04M
RDGL [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $23.83M. SAFLY’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $529.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $8.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RDGL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSAFLY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RDGL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SAFLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RDGL is a better buy in the long-term than SAFLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RDGL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAFLY’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RDGL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SAFLY’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SAFLY is a better buy in the short-term than RDGL.

Price Growth

RDGL (@Medical Specialties) experienced а -9.09% price change this week, while SAFLY (@Medical Specialties) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +1.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

RDGL is expected to report earnings on Mar 01, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (+1.36% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAFLY($529M) has a higher market cap than RDGL($23.8M). RDGL YTD gains are higher at: 4.439 vs. SAFLY (0.000). SAFLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 127M vs. RDGL (-1.97M). SAFLY has more cash in the bank: 78.7M vs. RDGL (1.41M). RDGL has less debt than SAFLY: RDGL (295K) vs SAFLY (184M). SAFLY has higher revenues than RDGL: SAFLY (1.03B) vs RDGL (29.5K).
RDGLSAFLYRDGL / SAFLY
Capitalization23.8M529M4%
EBITDA-1.97M127M-2%
Gain YTD4.4390.000-
P/E RatioN/A9.32-
Revenue29.5K1.03B0%
Total Cash1.41M78.7M2%
Total Debt295K184M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RDGL vs SAFLY: Fundamental Ratings
RDGL
SAFLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7042
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
61100
SMR RATING
1..100
10090
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4153
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8267
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RDGL's Valuation (67) in the null industry is in the same range as SAFLY (89). This means that RDGL’s stock grew similarly to SAFLY’s over the last 12 months.

RDGL's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAFLY (100). This means that RDGL’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAFLY’s over the last 12 months.

SAFLY's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as RDGL (100). This means that SAFLY’s stock grew similarly to RDGL’s over the last 12 months.

RDGL's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as SAFLY (53). This means that RDGL’s stock grew similarly to SAFLY’s over the last 12 months.

SAFLY's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the null industry is in the same range as RDGL (82). This means that SAFLY’s stock grew similarly to RDGL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RDGLSAFLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
12%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
12%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
81%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
4%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
RDGL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAFLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PH703.8938.08
+5.72%
Parker-Hannifin Corp
TORO2.880.08
+2.86%
Toro Corp
CTS51.230.15
+0.29%
CTS Corp
MOFG31.60-0.01
-0.03%
MidWestOne Financial Gp
BLCO17.65-0.23
-1.29%
Bausch + Lomb Corp

RDGL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RDGL and IART have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RDGL and IART's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RDGL
1D Price
Change %
RDGL100%
+0.84%
IART - RDGL
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
RYLPF - RDGL
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.87%
SAFLY - RDGL
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
POSC - RDGL
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.36%
REMI - RDGL
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More