RDGMF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
15.15M
RMGGY
Price
$5.02
Change
+$0.92 (+22.44%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
870.03M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RDGMF vs RMGGY

Header iconRDGMF vs RMGGY Comparison
Open Charts RDGMF vs RMGGYBanner chart's image
RIDGELINE MINERALS
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$38.27K
Capitalization15.15M
Resolute Mining
Price$5.02
Change+$0.92 (+22.44%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization870.03M
RDGMF vs RMGGY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RDGMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMGGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RDGMF vs. RMGGY commentary
Aug 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDGMF is a Hold and RMGGY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 27, 2025
Stock price -- (RDGMF: $0.11 vs. RMGGY: $5.02)
Brand notoriety: RDGMF and RMGGY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RDGMF: 28% vs. RMGGY: 186%
Market capitalization -- RDGMF: $15.15M vs. RMGGY: $870.03M
RDGMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $15.15M. RMGGY’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $870.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RDGMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMGGY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RDGMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RMGGY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMGGY is a better buy in the long-term than RDGMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RDGMF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMGGY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RDGMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RMGGY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RDGMF is a better buy in the short-term than RMGGY.

Price Growth

RDGMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +1.82% price change this week, while RMGGY (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4292.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.47% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMGGY($870M) has a higher market cap than RDGMF($15.2M). RMGGY YTD gains are higher at: 105.738 vs. RDGMF (17.895). RMGGY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 80.2M vs. RDGMF (-1.3M). RMGGY has more cash in the bank: 101M vs. RDGMF (2.69M). RDGMF has less debt than RMGGY: RDGMF (164K) vs RMGGY (58.7M). RMGGY has higher revenues than RDGMF: RMGGY (643M) vs RDGMF (0).
RDGMFRMGGYRDGMF / RMGGY
Capitalization15.2M870M2%
EBITDA-1.3M80.2M-2%
Gain YTD17.895105.73817%
P/E RatioN/A86.55-
Revenue0643M-
Total Cash2.69M101M3%
Total Debt164K58.7M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMGGY: Fundamental Ratings
RMGGY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
32
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RDGMFRMGGY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
83%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
8%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RDGMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMGGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STFGX128.93N/A
N/A
State Farm Growth
RSRFX11.34N/A
N/A
Reaves Infrastructure Fund Class Inst
MAPPX26.75N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Advantage A
HDVVX14.94N/A
N/A
Hartford International Equity R6
JMVIX16.73N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Mid Cap Value S

RDGMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RDGMF and TORXF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RDGMF and TORXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RDGMF
1D Price
Change %
RDGMF100%
-0.02%
TORXF - RDGMF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
PAAS - RDGMF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.85%
RIOFF - RDGMF
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.21%
USAU - RDGMF
23%
Poorly correlated
+9.42%
BCEKF - RDGMF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.71%
More

RMGGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMGGY and HMY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMGGY and HMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMGGY
1D Price
Change %
RMGGY100%
N/A
HMY - RMGGY
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.88%
USHAF - RMGGY
11%
Poorly correlated
-12.47%
RDGMF - RMGGY
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
RNDXF - RMGGY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLTMF - RMGGY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More