RDGMF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
15.15M
USHAF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.29M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RDGMF vs USHAF

Header iconRDGMF vs USHAF Comparison
Open Charts RDGMF vs USHAFBanner chart's image
RIDGELINE MINERALS
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$38.27K
Capitalization15.15M
USHA RES
Price$0.02
Change-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Volume$300
Capitalization2.29M
RDGMF vs USHAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RDGMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USHAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RDGMF vs. USHAF commentary
Aug 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDGMF is a Hold and USHAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 27, 2025
Stock price -- (RDGMF: $0.11 vs. USHAF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: RDGMF and USHAF are both not notable
RDGMF represents the Precious Metals, while USHAF is part of the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RDGMF: 28% vs. USHAF: 4%
Market capitalization -- RDGMF: $15.15M vs. USHAF: $2.29M
RDGMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $15.15M. USHAF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.31B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.61B. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RDGMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUSHAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RDGMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • USHAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, USHAF is a better buy in the long-term than RDGMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RDGMF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USHAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RDGMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • USHAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, USHAF is a better buy in the short-term than RDGMF.

Price Growth

RDGMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +1.82% price change this week, while USHAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -12.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3853.16%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +83.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.73% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.95% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDGMF($15.2M) has a higher market cap than USHAF($2.29M). RDGMF YTD gains are higher at: 17.895 vs. USHAF (-30.423). USHAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -801.48K vs. RDGMF (-1.3M). RDGMF has more cash in the bank: 2.69M vs. USHAF (1.12M). RDGMF (0) and USHAF (0) have equivalent revenues.
RDGMFUSHAFRDGMF / USHAF
Capitalization15.2M2.29M664%
EBITDA-1.3M-801.48K162%
Gain YTD17.895-30.423-59%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash2.69M1.12M240%
Total Debt164KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RDGMFUSHAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
83%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RDGMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USHAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AZN80.050.39
+0.49%
AstraZeneca PLC
FET24.76-0.30
-1.20%
Forum Energy Technologies
BFAM118.84-2.20
-1.82%
Bright Horizons Family Solutions
ABLV0.85-0.02
-2.14%
Able View Global
NEGG67.03-17.97
-21.14%
Newegg Commerce Inc

RDGMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RDGMF and TORXF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RDGMF and TORXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RDGMF
1D Price
Change %
RDGMF100%
-0.02%
TORXF - RDGMF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
PAAS - RDGMF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.85%
RIOFF - RDGMF
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.21%
USAU - RDGMF
23%
Poorly correlated
+9.42%
BCEKF - RDGMF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.71%
More

USHAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that USHAF and RGLD have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that USHAF and RGLD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USHAF
1D Price
Change %
USHAF100%
-12.47%
RGLD - USHAF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.91%
RMGGY - USHAF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RVTI - USHAF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KSTBF - USHAF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RDGMF - USHAF
-3%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
More