RDHL
Price
$1.36
Change
-$0.05 (-3.55%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
3.12M
One day until earnings call
SNOA
Price
$5.35
Change
+$0.08 (+1.52%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
8.79M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RDHL vs SNOA

Header iconRDHL vs SNOA Comparison
Open Charts RDHL vs SNOABanner chart's image
Redhill Biopharma
Price$1.36
Change-$0.05 (-3.55%)
Volume$27.09K
Capitalization3.12M
Sonoma Pharmaceuticals
Price$5.35
Change+$0.08 (+1.52%)
Volume$1.38M
Capitalization8.79M
RDHL vs SNOA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RDHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RDHL vs. SNOA commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDHL is a Hold and SNOA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (RDHL: $1.36 vs. SNOA: $5.35)
Brand notoriety: RDHL and SNOA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RDHL: 4% vs. SNOA: 80%
Market capitalization -- RDHL: $3.12M vs. SNOA: $8.79M
RDHL [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] is valued at $3.12M. SNOA’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] market capitalization is $8.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry ranges from $68.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry is $3.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RDHL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSNOA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RDHL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SNOA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SNOA is a better buy in the long-term than RDHL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RDHL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNOA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RDHL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SNOA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SNOA is a better buy in the short-term than RDHL.

Price Growth

RDHL (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а +17.24% price change this week, while SNOA (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was +74.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was +4.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +78.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

RDHL is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (+4.25% weekly)

A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SNOA($8.79M) has a higher market cap than RDHL($3.12M). SNOA YTD gains are higher at: 98.885 vs. RDHL (-78.100). SNOA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -4.32M vs. RDHL (-29.5M). RDHL has more cash in the bank: 7.28M vs. SNOA (5.24M). SNOA has less debt than RDHL: SNOA (119K) vs RDHL (558K). SNOA has higher revenues than RDHL: SNOA (14M) vs RDHL (3.71M).
RDHLSNOARDHL / SNOA
Capitalization3.12M8.79M36%
EBITDA-29.5M-4.32M684%
Gain YTD-78.10098.885-79%
P/E Ratio0.09N/A-
Revenue3.71M14M26%
Total Cash7.28M5.24M139%
Total Debt558K119K469%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RDHL vs SNOA: Fundamental Ratings
RDHL
SNOA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4950
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10097
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9636
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8158
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SNOA's Valuation (65) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is in the same range as RDHL (91) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that SNOA’s stock grew similarly to RDHL’s over the last 12 months.

SNOA's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is in the same range as RDHL (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that SNOA’s stock grew similarly to RDHL’s over the last 12 months.

SNOA's SMR Rating (97) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is in the same range as RDHL (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that SNOA’s stock grew similarly to RDHL’s over the last 12 months.

SNOA's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RDHL (96) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that SNOA’s stock grew somewhat faster than RDHL’s over the last 12 months.

SNOA's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is in the same range as RDHL (81) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that SNOA’s stock grew similarly to RDHL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RDHLSNOA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RDHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FRSX0.390.01
+3.18%
Foresight Autonomous Holdings Ltd
MKC69.70-0.49
-0.70%
McCormick & Company
SHMD2.56-0.02
-0.78%
SCHMID GROUP N.V.
CLSK9.75-0.20
-2.01%
CleanSpark
KOP29.61-1.03
-3.36%
Koppers Holdings

RDHL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RDHL and ACET have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RDHL and ACET's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RDHL
1D Price
Change %
RDHL100%
-3.55%
ACET - RDHL
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
EOLS - RDHL
25%
Poorly correlated
+5.16%
SNOA - RDHL
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.52%
DVAX - RDHL
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
TEVA - RDHL
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
More