Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RDLAX vs RGAHX
RDLAX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts RDLAX vs RGAHX
Columbia Disciplined Growth A
Price$12.30
Change-$0.13 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.04M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$85.18
Change+$0.45 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
RDLAX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RDLAX vs. RGAHX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDLAX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. RDLAX (309M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than RDLAX: RGAHX (0.44) vs RDLAX (0.00). RDLAX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: RDLAX (19 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). RDLAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RDLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLAX: RGAHX (250) vs RDLAX (2000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.29 vs. RDLAX (5.85). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 33.63 vs. RDLAX (11.11).
| RDLAX | RGAHX | RDLAX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.44 | 241% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.44 | 266% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.100 | 15.373 | 92% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 309M | 327B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.85 | 7.29 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.82 | 62.36 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.11 | 33.63 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.22 | 88.07 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement