Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RDLAX vs RGAHX
RDLAX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts RDLAX vs RGAHX
Columbia Disciplined Growth A
Price$12.43
Change+$0.06 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets308.94M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$86.76
Change+$0.18 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
RDLAX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RDLAX vs. RGAHX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDLAX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. RDLAX (309M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than RDLAX: RGAHX (0.45) vs RDLAX (0.00). RDLAX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: RDLAX (18 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). RDLAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RDLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLAX: RGAHX (250) vs RDLAX (2000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.50 vs. RDLAX (7.01). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 40.45 vs. RDLAX (11.74).
| RDLAX | RGAHX | RDLAX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.44 | 241% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.44 | 266% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.750 | 17.892 | 82% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 309M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.45 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.01 | 11.50 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.98 | 72.40 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.74 | 40.45 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.71 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement