Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RDLAX vs RGEBX
RDLAX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts RDLAX vs RGEBX
Columbia Disciplined Growth A
Price$11.87
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.97M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$81.40
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
RDLAX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RDLAX vs. RGEBX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDLAX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. RDLAX (300M). RDLAX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . RDLAX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: RDLAX (18 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RDLAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). RDLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLAX: RGEBX (250) vs RDLAX (2000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.85 vs. RDLAX (8.10). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 40.64 vs. RDLAX (12.71).
| RDLAX | RGEBX | RDLAX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.09 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.09 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.204 | 13.942 | 73% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 300M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.10 | 13.85 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.06 | 40.38 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.71 | 40.64 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.79 | 79.50 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers