Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RDLCX vs RGEBX
RDLCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts RDLCX vs RGEBX
Columbia Disciplined Growth C
Price$10.11
Change+$0.05 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets295.81M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$82.32
Change+$0.51 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
RDLCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RDLCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDLCX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. RDLCX (296M). RDLCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . RDLCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: RDLCX (18 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RDLCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). RDLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLCX: RGEBX (250) vs RDLCX (2000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.97 vs. RDLCX (5.67). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.49 vs. RDLCX (-3.08).
| RDLCX | RGEBX | RDLCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.09 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.09 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.229 | 15.230 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 296M | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.67 | 14.97 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.14 | 52.24 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.08 | 34.49 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.25 | 91.38 | 19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement