Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RDLCX vs RGEBX
RDLCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts RDLCX vs RGEBX
Columbia Disciplined Growth C
Price$9.94
Change+$0.14 (+1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets296.05M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$80.26
Change+$0.70 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.74B
RDLCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RDLCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDLCX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. RDLCX (296M). RDLCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . RDLCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: RDLCX (18 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RDLCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). RDLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLCX: RGEBX (250) vs RDLCX (2000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.90 vs. RDLCX (11.36). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 39.18 vs. RDLCX (-0.41).
| RDLCX | RGEBX | RDLCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.09 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.09 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.406 | 12.346 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 296M | 325B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.36 | 19.90 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.44 | 43.68 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.41 | 39.18 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.77 | 78.71 | 11% |