RDNT
Price
$71.41
Change
-$0.89 (-1.23%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
5.49B
58 days until earnings call
SNZZF
Price
$0.71
Change
+$0.01 (+1.43%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
107.34M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RDNT vs SNZZF

Header iconRDNT vs SNZZF Comparison
Open Charts RDNT vs SNZZFBanner chart's image
RadNet
Price$71.41
Change-$0.89 (-1.23%)
Volume$467.53K
Capitalization5.49B
Senzime AB
Price$0.71
Change+$0.01 (+1.43%)
Volume$82.36K
Capitalization107.34M
RDNT vs SNZZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RDNT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RDNT vs. SNZZF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDNT is a StrongBuy and SNZZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (RDNT: $71.41 vs. SNZZF: $0.71)
Brand notoriety: RDNT and SNZZF are both not notable
RDNT represents the Medical Specialties, while SNZZF is part of the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RDNT: 60% vs. SNZZF: 145%
Market capitalization -- RDNT: $5.49B vs. SNZZF: $107.34M
RDNT [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $5.49B. SNZZF’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $107.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $231.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $10.69B. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RDNT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSNZZF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RDNT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SNZZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RDNT is a better buy in the long-term than SNZZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RDNT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNZZF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RDNT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SNZZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both RDNT and SNZZF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

RDNT (@Medical Specialties) experienced а -0.49% price change this week, while SNZZF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.64%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

RDNT is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (+1.01% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

@Medical/Nursing Services (-0.04% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDNT($5.49B) has a higher market cap than SNZZF($107M). SNZZF YTD gains are higher at: 33.814 vs. RDNT (2.248). RDNT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 298M vs. SNZZF (-84.06M). RDNT has more cash in the bank: 833M vs. SNZZF (132M). SNZZF has less debt than RDNT: SNZZF (14.9M) vs RDNT (1.84B). RDNT has higher revenues than SNZZF: RDNT (1.91B) vs SNZZF (80.6M).
RDNTSNZZFRDNT / SNZZF
Capitalization5.49B107M5,134%
EBITDA298M-84.06M-355%
Gain YTD2.24833.8147%
P/E Ratio1425.75N/A-
Revenue1.91B80.6M2,367%
Total Cash833M132M631%
Total Debt1.84B14.9M12,356%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RDNT vs SNZZF: Fundamental Ratings
RDNT
SNZZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35100
SMR RATING
1..100
9297
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3944
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SNZZF's Valuation (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RDNT (95) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that SNZZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RDNT’s over the last 12 months.

RDNT's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNZZF (100) in the null industry. This means that RDNT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNZZF’s over the last 12 months.

RDNT's SMR Rating (92) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as SNZZF (97) in the null industry. This means that RDNT’s stock grew similarly to SNZZF’s over the last 12 months.

RDNT's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as SNZZF (44) in the null industry. This means that RDNT’s stock grew similarly to SNZZF’s over the last 12 months.

RDNT's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for SNZZF (100) in the null industry. This means that RDNT’s stock grew significantly faster than SNZZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RDNTSNZZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
23%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
72%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RDNT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INSLX43.110.36
+0.84%
Invesco International Small-Mid Com R5
VFWSX137.230.77
+0.56%
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Instl
CZMGX20.27-0.02
-0.10%
Multi-Manager Growth Strategies Inst
MIVIX29.23-0.08
-0.27%
Madison Large Cap I
BEGIX22.30-0.22
-0.98%
Sterling Capital Equity Income Instl

RDNT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RDNT has been loosely correlated with ITGR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RDNT jumps, then ITGR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RDNT
1D Price
Change %
RDNT100%
-1.23%
ITGR - RDNT
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
GKOS - RDNT
48%
Loosely correlated
+4.22%
NNOX - RDNT
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
TWST - RDNT
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
ICUI - RDNT
43%
Loosely correlated
+4.47%
More

SNZZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SNZZF and COO have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNZZF and COO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNZZF
1D Price
Change %
SNZZF100%
N/A
COO - SNZZF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
MYO - SNZZF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
COCH - SNZZF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.22%
RDNT - SNZZF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.23%
SSMXY - SNZZF
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.26%
More