REAX
Price
$4.68
Change
-$0.30 (-6.02%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:29 PM (EDT)
86 days until earnings call
RMAX
Price
$10.88
Change
-$0.90 (-7.64%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:27 PM (EDT)
64 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

REAX vs RMAX

Header iconREAX vs RMAX Comparison
Open Charts REAX vs RMAXBanner chart's image
Real Brokerage (The)
Price$4.68
Change-$0.30 (-6.02%)
Volume$280
CapitalizationN/A
Re/Max Holdings
Price$10.88
Change-$0.90 (-7.64%)
Volume$343
CapitalizationN/A
REAX vs RMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
REAX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMAX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
REAX vs. RMAX commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REAX is a Buy and RMAX is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (REAX: $4.98 vs. RMAX: $11.78)
Brand notoriety: REAX and RMAX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: REAX: 137% vs. RMAX: 76%
Market capitalization -- REAX: $572.85M vs. RMAX: $160.28M
REAX [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $572.85M. RMAX’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $160.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

REAX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMAX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • REAX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RMAX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMAX is a better buy in the long-term than REAX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

REAX’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMAX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • REAX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RMAX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMAX is a better buy in the short-term than REAX.

Price Growth

REAX (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -2.16% price change this week, while RMAX (@Real Estate Development) price change was -4.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -1.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

REAX is expected to report earnings on Mar 14, 2025.

RMAX is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-1.93% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REAX($573M) has a higher market cap than RMAX($160M). REAX YTD gains are higher at: 211.250 vs. RMAX (-11.628). RMAX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 26.6M vs. REAX (-26.02M). RMAX has more cash in the bank: 82.6M vs. REAX (28.9M). REAX has less debt than RMAX: REAX (0) vs RMAX (484M). REAX has higher revenues than RMAX: REAX (689M) vs RMAX (326M).
REAXRMAXREAX / RMAX
Capitalization573M160M358%
EBITDA-26.02M26.6M-98%
Gain YTD211.250-11.628-1,817%
P/E RatioN/A1111.11-
Revenue689M326M211%
Total Cash28.9M82.6M35%
Total Debt0484M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMAX: Fundamental Ratings
RMAX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
64
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
89
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
REAXRMAX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
REAX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMAX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYAEX103.930.17
+0.16%
Rydex Europe 1.25x Strategy A
GFCUX23.26N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Enh CorEqFund-ShareClassR6
DLDYX44.10-0.24
-0.54%
BNY Mellon Natural Resources Y
VTCAX82.22-0.53
-0.64%
Vanguard Communication Svcs Idx Admiral
TSPFX7.19-0.07
-0.96%
Transamerica Small Cap Growth R4

REAX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that REAX and HHH have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that REAX and HHH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To REAX
1D Price
Change %
REAX100%
-0.99%
HHH - REAX
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.45%
FOR - REAX
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
MMI - REAX
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.63%
RDFN - REAX
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.30%
RMAX - REAX
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.00%
More

RMAX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMAX has been closely correlated with HOUS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RMAX jumps, then HOUS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMAX
1D Price
Change %
RMAX100%
-2.00%
HOUS - RMAX
67%
Closely correlated
-1.88%
RDFN - RMAX
62%
Loosely correlated
-3.30%
EXPI - RMAX
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.48%
OPEN - RMAX
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
KW - RMAX
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.37%
More