Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REBAX vs VEMBX
REBAX vs VEMBX Comparison
Open Charts REBAX vs VEMBX
Columbia Emerging Markets Bond A
Price$9.55
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets280.77M
Vanguard Emerging Markets Bond Investor
Price$10.06
Change-$0.03 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.57B
REBAX vs VEMBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REBAX vs. VEMBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REBAX is a Hold and VEMBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEMBX has more cash in the bank: 4.57B vs. REBAX (281M). VEMBX pays higher dividends than REBAX: VEMBX (6.72) vs REBAX (5.12). REBAX was incepted earlier than VEMBX: REBAX (19 years) vs VEMBX (9 years). REBAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than VEMBX (0.50). VEMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 137.00 vs. REBAX (41.00). REBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEMBX: REBAX (2000) vs VEMBX (3000). VEMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.18 vs. REBAX (7.24). VEMBX return over 5 years is better than : 16.86 vs. REBAX (9.09).
| REBAX | VEMBX | REBAX / VEMBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.50 | 226% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.50 | 226% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.257 | 3.966 | 82% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 281M | 4.57B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.12 | 6.72 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.24 | 8.18 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.94 | 26.44 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.09 | 16.86 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.78 | N/A | - |