Ad is loading...
REBAX vs VEMBX
REBAX vs VEMBX Comparison
Open Charts REBAX vs VEMBX
Columbia Emerging Markets Bond A
Price$9.51
Change+$0.05 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets277.68M
Vanguard Emerging Markets Bond Investor
Price$10.05
Change+$0.05 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.4B
REBAX vs VEMBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REBAX vs. VEMBX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REBAX is a Hold and VEMBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEMBX has more cash in the bank: 4.4B vs. REBAX (278M). VEMBX pays higher dividends than REBAX: VEMBX (6.73) vs REBAX (5.16). REBAX was incepted earlier than VEMBX: REBAX (19 years) vs VEMBX (9 years). REBAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than VEMBX (0.50). VEMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 137.00 vs. REBAX (41.00). REBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEMBX: REBAX (2000) vs VEMBX (3000). VEMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.54 vs. REBAX (6.48). VEMBX return over 5 years is better than : 23.92 vs. REBAX (14.72).
| REBAX | VEMBX | REBAX / VEMBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.50 | 226% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.50 | 226% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.796 | 2.496 | 72% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 278M | 4.4B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.16 | 6.73 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.48 | 7.54 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.71 | 26.11 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.72 | 23.92 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.71 | N/A | - |