Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REBAX vs VEMBX
REBAX vs VEMBX Comparison
Open Charts REBAX vs VEMBX
Columbia Emerging Markets Bond A
Price$10.10
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets347.19M
Vanguard Emerging Markets Bond Investor
Price$10.68
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.26B
REBAX vs VEMBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REBAX vs. VEMBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REBAX is a Hold and VEMBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEMBX has more cash in the bank: 5.26B vs. REBAX (347M). VEMBX pays higher dividends than REBAX: VEMBX (6.09) vs REBAX (4.77). REBAX was incepted earlier than VEMBX: REBAX (20 years) vs VEMBX (10 years). REBAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than VEMBX (0.50). VEMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 137.00 vs. REBAX (41.00). REBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEMBX: REBAX (2000) vs VEMBX (3000). VEMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.14 vs. REBAX (11.05). VEMBX return over 5 years is better than : 16.80 vs. REBAX (8.73).
| REBAX | VEMBX | REBAX / VEMBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.50 | 226% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.50 | 226% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.258 | 12.598 | 89% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 347M | 5.26B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.77 | 6.09 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.05 | 12.14 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.81 | 40.24 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.73 | 16.80 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.85 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement