Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REBAX vs VEMBX
REBAX vs VEMBX Comparison
Open Charts REBAX vs VEMBX
Columbia Emerging Markets Bond A
Price$9.85
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets295.06M
Vanguard Emerging Markets Bond Investor
Price$10.40
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.73B
REBAX vs VEMBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REBAX vs. VEMBX commentary
Aug 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REBAX is a Hold and VEMBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEMBX has more cash in the bank: 4.73B vs. REBAX (295M). VEMBX pays higher dividends than REBAX: VEMBX (6.47) vs REBAX (5.03). REBAX was incepted earlier than VEMBX: REBAX (20 years) vs VEMBX (9 years). REBAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than VEMBX (0.50). VEMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 137.00 vs. REBAX (41.00). REBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEMBX: REBAX (2000) vs VEMBX (3000). VEMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.82 vs. REBAX (8.55). VEMBX return over 5 years is better than : 14.33 vs. REBAX (7.05).
| REBAX | VEMBX | REBAX / VEMBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.50 | 226% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.50 | 226% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.142 | 8.255 | 87% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 295M | 4.73B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.03 | 6.47 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.55 | 9.82 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.36 | 31.09 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.05 | 14.33 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement