Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RECS vs RFFC
RECS vs RFFC Comparison
Open Charts RECS vs RFFC
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$35.34
Change-$0.46 (-1.28%)
Volume$422.01K
Net Assets2.9B
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF
Price$58.78
Change+$0.14 (+0.24%)
Volume$216
Net Assets22.06M
RECS vs RFFC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RECS vs. RFFC commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECS is a Buy and RFFC is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.9B vs. RFFC (22.1M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than RFFC: RECS (2.080) vs RFFC (1.352). RECS was incepted earlier than RFFC: RECS (6 years) vs RFFC (9 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than RFFC (0.48). RECS has a higher turnover RFFC (33.00) vs RFFC (33.00).
| RECS | RFFC | RECS / RFFC | |
| Gain YTD | 2.080 | 1.352 | 154% |
| Net Assets | 2.9B | 22.1M | 13,136% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.48 | 31% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 33.00 | 148% |
| Yield | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -1.28% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -2.88% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.97% | ||
More | ||||
RFFC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RFFC has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RFFC jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RFFC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFFC | 100% | N/A | ||
| GS - RFFC | 74% Closely correlated | -1.85% | ||
| BX - RFFC | 71% Closely correlated | -3.11% | ||
| APH - RFFC | 68% Closely correlated | -2.23% | ||
| TT - RFFC | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| SBGSY - RFFC | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.98% | ||
More | ||||