Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RECS vs RFFC
RECS vs RFFC Comparison
Open Charts RECS vs RFFC
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$39.05
Change-$0.15 (-0.38%)
Volume$1.91M
Net Assets3.57B
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF
Price$62.60
Change-$0.19 (-0.30%)
Volume$1.87K
Net Assets21.98M
RECS vs RFFC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RECS vs. RFFC commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECS is a Hold and RFFC is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.57B vs. RFFC (22M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than RFFC: RECS (12.796) vs RFFC (8.300). RECS was incepted earlier than RFFC: RECS (6 years) vs RFFC (9 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than RFFC (0.48). RECS has a higher turnover RFFC (33.00) vs RFFC (33.00).
| RECS | RFFC | RECS / RFFC | |
| Gain YTD | 12.796 | 8.300 | 154% |
| Net Assets | 3.57B | 22M | 16,241% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.48 | 31% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 33.00 | 148% |
| Yield | 0.62 | 0.88 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | RFFC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 10 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 72% | 23 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.38% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
More | ||||
RFFC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RFFC has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RFFC jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RFFC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFFC | 100% | -0.30% | ||
| GS - RFFC | 74% Closely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| BX - RFFC | 70% Closely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| APH - RFFC | 67% Closely correlated | -2.04% | ||
| SBGSY - RFFC | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| TT - RFFC | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
More | ||||