Ad is loading...
RECS vs RFFC
RECS vs RFFC Comparison
Open Charts RECS vs RFFC
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$31.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$469.2K
Net Assets2.27B
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF
Price$52.51
Change-$0.02 (-0.04%)
Volume$843
Net Assets23.64M
RECS vs RFFC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RECS vs. RFFC commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECS is a Hold and RFFC is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.27B vs. RFFC (23.6M). RFFC has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: RFFC (-9.470) vs RECS (-10.312). RECS was incepted earlier than RFFC: RECS (6 years) vs RFFC (9 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than RFFC (0.48). RECS has a higher turnover RFFC (33.00) vs RFFC (33.00).
| RECS | RFFC | RECS / RFFC | |
| Gain YTD | -10.312 | -9.470 | 109% |
| Net Assets | 2.27B | 23.6M | 9,610% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.48 | 31% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 33.00 | 148% |
| Yield | 0.73 | 0.94 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | N/A | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.50% | ||
More | ||||
RFFC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RFFC has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RFFC jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RFFC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFFC | 100% | -0.05% | ||
| GS - RFFC | 77% Closely correlated | +2.09% | ||
| BX - RFFC | 76% Closely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| APH - RFFC | 70% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| TT - RFFC | 67% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| BKR - RFFC | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.05% | ||
More | ||||