Ad is loading...
RECS vs RFFC
RECS vs RFFC Comparison
Open Charts RECS vs RFFC
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$35.95
Change+$0.16 (+0.45%)
Volume$100
Net Assets1.81B
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF
Price$60.15
Change-$0.19 (-0.31%)
Volume$340
Net Assets24.05M
RECS vs RFFC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RECS vs. RFFC commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECS is a Buy and RFFC is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 1.81B vs. RFFC (24.1M). RFFC (3.524) and RECS (3.380) have matching annual dividend yield . RECS was incepted earlier than RFFC: RECS (5 years) vs RFFC (9 years). RFFC has a higher turnover RECS (45.00) vs RECS (45.00).
| RECS | RFFC | RECS / RFFC | |
| Gain YTD | 3.380 | 3.524 | 96% |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 24.1M | 7,523% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 45.00 | 129.00 | 35% |
| Yield | 0.89 | 1.13 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 9 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | RFFC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 24 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 24 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 24 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 24 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 87% | 26 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 70% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +2.72% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -6.18% | ||
| JHG - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| LRCX - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | +7.43% | ||
More | ||||
RFFC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RFFC has been loosely correlated with SBGSY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RFFC jumps, then SBGSY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RFFC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFFC | 100% | N/A | ||
| SBGSY - RFFC | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| TT - RFFC | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| ITOCY - RFFC | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.21% | ||
| IQV - RFFC | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.87% | ||
| DKNG - RFFC | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.98% | ||
More | ||||