Ad is loading...
RECS vs RFFC
RECS vs RFFC Comparison
Open Charts RECS vs RFFC
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$33.46
Change+$0.29 (+0.87%)
Volume$396.89K
Net Assets2.57B
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF
Price$55.75
Change+$0.16 (+0.29%)
Volume$358
Net Assets22.25M
RECS vs RFFC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RECS vs. RFFC commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECS is a Buy and RFFC is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.57B vs. RFFC (22.2M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than RFFC: RECS (-3.351) vs RFFC (-3.871). RECS was incepted earlier than RFFC: RECS (6 years) vs RFFC (9 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than RFFC (0.48). RECS has a higher turnover RFFC (33.00) vs RFFC (33.00).
| RECS | RFFC | RECS / RFFC | |
| Gain YTD | -3.351 | -3.871 | 87% |
| Net Assets | 2.57B | 22.2M | 11,590% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.48 | 31% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 33.00 | 148% |
| Yield | 0.73 | 0.96 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.87% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +1.79% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
More | ||||
RFFC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RFFC has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RFFC jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RFFC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFFC | 100% | +0.30% | ||
| GS - RFFC | 76% Closely correlated | +2.50% | ||
| BX - RFFC | 74% Closely correlated | +2.70% | ||
| APH - RFFC | 70% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| TT - RFFC | 67% Closely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| LIN - RFFC | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
More | ||||