Ad is loading...
RECS vs SAMT
RECS vs SAMT Comparison
Open Charts RECS vs SAMT
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$33.58
Change+$0.26 (+0.78%)
Volume$475.82K
Net Assets2.29B
Strategas Macro Thematic Opp ETF
Price$29.63
Change+$0.26 (+0.89%)
Volume$12.15K
Net Assets118.4M
RECS vs SAMT Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RECS vs. SAMT commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECS is a Hold and SAMT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.29B vs. SAMT (118M). SAMT has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: SAMT (1.699) vs RECS (-3.004). RECS was incepted earlier than SAMT: RECS (6 years) vs SAMT (3 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than SAMT (0.65). SAMT has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| RECS | SAMT | RECS / SAMT | |
| Gain YTD | -3.004 | 1.699 | -177% |
| Net Assets | 2.29B | 118M | 1,937% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.65 | 23% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 150.00 | 33% |
| Yield | 0.73 | 1.40 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | SAMT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 70% | 6 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.78% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +2.00% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +2.38% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| JHG - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.43% | ||
| LRCX - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.30% | ||
More | ||||
SAMT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAMT has been loosely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAMT jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAMT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAMT | 100% | +0.90% | ||
| AMAT - SAMT | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.43% | ||
| LAZ - SAMT | 51% Loosely correlated | +3.79% | ||
| COST - SAMT | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| MSFT - SAMT | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| META - SAMT | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
More | ||||