Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RECS vs SAMT
RECS vs SAMT Comparison
Open Charts RECS vs SAMT
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$40.01
Change+$0.16 (+0.40%)
Volume$3.92K
Net Assets3.97B
Strategas Macro Thematic Opp ETF
Price$39.04
Change-$0.10 (-0.26%)
Volume$400
Net Assets269.77M
RECS vs SAMT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RECS vs. SAMT commentary
Oct 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECS is a Hold and SAMT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.97B vs. SAMT (270M). SAMT has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: SAMT (34.340) vs RECS (15.107). RECS was incepted earlier than SAMT: RECS (6 years) vs SAMT (4 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than SAMT (0.66). SAMT has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| RECS | SAMT | RECS / SAMT | |
| Gain YTD | 15.107 | 34.340 | 44% |
| Net Assets | 3.97B | 270M | 1,471% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.66 | 23% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 91.00 | 54% |
| Yield | 0.60 | 1.10 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | SAMT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 7 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 70% | 21 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -1.67% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +3.30% | ||
More | ||||
SAMT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAMT has been loosely correlated with LAZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAMT jumps, then LAZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAMT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAMT | 100% | +0.33% | ||
| LAZ - SAMT | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| RKLB - SAMT | 23% Poorly correlated | +3.99% | ||
| OKLO - SAMT | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.83% | ||
| PLTR - SAMT | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.43% | ||
| MMC - SAMT | 19% Poorly correlated | +0.81% | ||
More | ||||