Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RECS vs SNAV
RECS vs SNAV Comparison
Open Charts RECS vs SNAV
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$39.46
Change-$0.12 (-0.30%)
Volume$334.6K
Net Assets3.66B
RECS vs SNAV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RECS vs. SNAV commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECS is a Hold and SNAV is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.66B vs. SNAV (24.5M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than SNAV: RECS (13.980) vs SNAV (12.921). RECS was incepted earlier than SNAV: RECS (6 years) vs SNAV (3 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than SNAV (1.15). SNAV has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| RECS | SNAV | RECS / SNAV | |
| Gain YTD | 13.980 | 12.921 | 108% |
| Net Assets | 3.66B | 24.5M | 14,918% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 1.15 | 13% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 523.00 | 9% |
| Yield | 0.62 | 0.44 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | SNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 72% | 12 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AIYY | 2.64 | 0.02 | +0.76% |
| YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
| EFFE | 23.06 | N/A | N/A |
| Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF | |||
| GBLD | 18.81 | N/A | N/A |
| Invesco MSCI Green Building ETF | |||
| IGEB | 46.17 | -0.08 | -0.16% |
| iShares Investment Grade Systmtc Bd ETF | |||
| RFG | 51.19 | -0.45 | -0.88% |
| Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF | |||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.30% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -3.16% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.77% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -1.82% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.56% | ||
More | ||||