Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
RECS vs SNAV
RECS vs SNAV Comparison
Open Charts RECS vs SNAV
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$35.18
Change-$0.38 (-1.07%)
Volume$434.5K
CapitalizationN/A
Mohr Sector Nav ETF
Price$31.17
Change-$0.32 (-1.02%)
Volume$9.62K
CapitalizationN/A
RECS vs SNAV Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RECS vs. SNAV commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECS is a Hold and SNAV is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 1.36B vs. SNAV (31.2M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than SNAV: RECS (26.958) vs SNAV (13.476). RECS was incepted earlier than SNAV: RECS (5 years) vs SNAV (2 years). SNAV has a higher turnover RECS (45.00) vs RECS (45.00).
| RECS | SNAV | RECS / SNAV | |
| Gain YTD | 26.958 | 13.476 | 200% |
| Net Assets | 1.36B | 31.2M | 4,353% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 45.00 | 201.00 | 22% |
| Yield | 0.89 | 0.31 | 289% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | SNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 7 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -1.07% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -4.19% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -4.40% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -2.79% | ||
| JHG - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.54% | ||
| LRCX - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | -6.34% | ||
More | ||||